| People | Locations | Statistics |
|---|---|---|
| Naji, M. |
| |
| Motta, Antonella |
| |
| Aletan, Dirar |
| |
| Mohamed, Tarek |
| |
| Ertürk, Emre |
| |
| Taccardi, Nicola |
| |
| Kononenko, Denys |
| |
| Petrov, R. H. | Madrid |
|
| Alshaaer, Mazen | Brussels |
|
| Bih, L. |
| |
| Casati, R. |
| |
| Muller, Hermance |
| |
| Kočí, Jan | Prague |
|
| Šuljagić, Marija |
| |
| Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-Artemi | Brussels |
|
| Azam, Siraj |
| |
| Ospanova, Alyiya |
| |
| Blanpain, Bart |
| |
| Ali, M. A. |
| |
| Popa, V. |
| |
| Rančić, M. |
| |
| Ollier, Nadège |
| |
| Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro |
| |
| Landes, Michael |
| |
| Rignanese, Gian-Marco |
|
Arsić, Dušan
in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%
Topics
Publications (19/19 displayed)
- 2024Advanced welding technologies: FSW in automotive manufacturing
- 2024Influence of FDM printing parameters on the compressive mechanical properties and fracture behavior of ABS material
- 2024A new artificial neural network model for predicting fatigue limit and fracture toughness values of some stainless steels
- 2024A new artificial neural network model for predicting fatigue limit and fracture toughness values of some stainless steels
- 2024Assessment of mechanical properties of austenitic stainless steels using artificial neural networks
- 2024Predicting the yield stress and tensile strength of two stainless steel using artificial intelligence
- 2023Prediction of service life of components and structures of hydro power plants during the design, prototyping and service period
- 2023Influence of TiN Coating on the Drawing Force and Friction Coefficient in the Deep Drawing Process of AlMg4.5Mn0.7 Thin Sheetscitations
- 2023Effect of plastic strain and specimen geometry on plastic strain ratio values for various materialscitations
- 2022Theoretical-experimental estimation of weldability of different types of steels by hard facing
- 2022Analysis of Filler Metals Influence on Quality of Hard-Faced Surfaces of Gears Based on Tests in Experimental and Operating Conditionscitations
- 2021Influence of different hard-facing procedures on quality of surfaces of regenerated gearscitations
- 2020The effect of heat input on the fracture behaviour of surface weld metal of rail steel
- 2018Tribological characteristics of Al/SiC/Gr hybrid compositescitations
- 2018The influence of heat input on the toughness and fracture mechanism of surface weld metal
- 2018Working life estimate of the tubular T-joint by application of the LEFM concept
- 2018Experimental-numerical analysis of appearance and growth of a crack in hard-faced layers of the hot-work high-strength tool steels
- 2016COMPARATIVE STUDY OF AN ENVIRONMENTALLY FRIENDLY LUBRICANT WITH CONVENTIONAL LUBRICANTS IN STRIP IRONING TEST
- 2015Two-phase ironing process in conditions of ecologic and classic lubricants application
Places of action
| Organizations | Location | People |
|---|
article
Effect of plastic strain and specimen geometry on plastic strain ratio values for various materials
Abstract
The aim of this paper is to show influence of two elements on plastic strain ratio value, or "r" value. The first element is value of plastic strain, and second is specimen geometry. Extensive experiment was conducted according to appropriate tensile test procedure with 3 materials and 5 different specimen geometries. Steel sheet S235JR, austenitic stainless-steel sheet X5CrNi18-10 and Al alloy sheet AlSi0.9MgMn (i.e. ENAW 6081) were used during the experiments. Nominal thickness for all three sheets was 1 mm. Three out of five specimen geometries had 20 mm width and gage length of 60, 120 and 160 mm while the rest of specimens had width of 15 mm and gage length of 50, 100 mm. All the specimens were laser cut in rolling direction. In preparation part of the experiment, behind material characterization (obtaining base mechanical properties) identification of homogenous deformation field was performed, i.e. plastic strain at the beginning of localization, for each specimen. Related to that strain value 6 degrees of deformation were realized: 75%, 80%, 85%, 90%, 95% and 100%. Results showed expected and significant difference in "r" value for used materials, but influence of specimen geometry and realized plastic strains were low. ; Published