People | Locations | Statistics |
---|---|---|
Naji, M. |
| |
Motta, Antonella |
| |
Aletan, Dirar |
| |
Mohamed, Tarek |
| |
Ertürk, Emre |
| |
Taccardi, Nicola |
| |
Kononenko, Denys |
| |
Petrov, R. H. | Madrid |
|
Alshaaer, Mazen | Brussels |
|
Bih, L. |
| |
Casati, R. |
| |
Muller, Hermance |
| |
Kočí, Jan | Prague |
|
Šuljagić, Marija |
| |
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-Artemi | Brussels |
|
Azam, Siraj |
| |
Ospanova, Alyiya |
| |
Blanpain, Bart |
| |
Ali, M. A. |
| |
Popa, V. |
| |
Rančić, M. |
| |
Ollier, Nadège |
| |
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro |
| |
Landes, Michael |
| |
Rignanese, Gian-Marco |
|
Kala, Zdeněk
Brno University of Technology
in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%
Topics
Publications (7/7 displayed)
- 2023Comparison of crack propagation rates in selected structural components made from AISI 304 grades: Three-point bending testcitations
- 2022A Comparison of Shell and Solid Finite Element Models of Austenitic Stainless Steel Columns in Compression
- 2022Flexural buckling of stainless steel CHS columns: Reliability analysis utilizing FEM simulationscitations
- 2022Experimental and Numerical simulation of a Three Point Bending Test of a Stainless Steel Beam ; Experimentální a numerická simulace tříbodového ohybového testu nosníku z nerezové ocelicitations
- 2021Experimental and Numerical simulation of a Three Point Bending Test of a Stainless Steel Beamcitations
- 2020Estimating probability of fatigue failure of steel structurescitations
- 2017Random fields of initial out of straightness leading to column bucklingcitations
Places of action
Organizations | Location | People |
---|
conferencepaper
A Comparison of Shell and Solid Finite Element Models of Austenitic Stainless Steel Columns in Compression
Abstract
The subject of this article is the implementation of new knowledge on material and geometric characteristics obtained from an experimental research program in advanced numerical modelling of compressed columns made of austenitic stainless steel using the ANSYS Classic software. Nonlinear stress–strain curves were obtained using our own experimental program and studied in terms of identifying the most suitable nonlinear material model. Additional material and geometric characteristics were obtained from literature and other independent research. Numerical models differing in mesh density localization, formulation of element integration, non-linear material model, and initial geometric imperfections were created and compared. The aim of the models was the ultimate limit state of a strut of circular hollow cross-section stressed by compression and analysed using the geometrically and materially nonlinear solution with consideration to the influence of initial imperfections. Static resistance and limit state deformations are compared for each model. The paper presents the analysis of model uncertainty by comparing SHELL and SOLID FE models, which must be characterized before the start of the analysis of the random influence of imperfections on the limit states. The mean values and the coefficients of variation are practically the same for both approaches. In summary, the presented models can be considered sufficiently validated and eligible for integration in tandem with simulation sampling methods.