Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Cheneler, David

  • Google
  • 15
  • 40
  • 184

Lancaster University

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (15/15 displayed)

  • 2024Manufacture and calibration of high stiffness AFM cantileverscitations
  • 2021Manufacture and calibration of high stiffness AFM cantileverscitations
  • 2021Different approaches for manufacturing ti-6al-4v alloy with triply periodic minimal surface sheet-based structures by electron beam melting35citations
  • 2020Manufacture and calibration of high stiffness AFM cantileverscitations
  • 2020Measurement and modelling of the elastic defection of novel metal syntactic foam composite sandwich structures in 3-point bending9citations
  • 2020The impact of post manufacturing treatment of functionally graded Ti6Al4V scaffolds on their surface morphology and mechanical strength44citations
  • 2020A fast and portable imager for neutron and gamma emitting radionuclides18citations
  • 2019Surface temperature equalisation through automated laser vaporisation of thick film electrical heating elementscitations
  • 2017Liquid-like behaviour of gold nanowire bridges2citations
  • 2016On the origin and magnitude of surface stresses due to metal nanofilms4citations
  • 2014Transient bioimpedance monitoring of mechanotransduction in artificial tissue during indentation6citations
  • 2013NEMS based tactile sensing in an artificial fingercitations
  • 2013Spherical indentation analysis of stress relaxation for thin film viscoelastic materials16citations
  • 2013Degradation of polymer films43citations
  • 2011Characteristics and durability of fluoropolymer thin films7citations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Vicary, James
3 / 3 shared
Bowen, James
10 / 51 shared
Khrapov, Dmitry
1 / 1 shared
Koptyug, Andrey
1 / 14 shared
Meinel, Dietmar
1 / 16 shared
Kozadayeva, Maria
1 / 1 shared
Manabaev, Kayrat
1 / 1 shared
Mishurova, Tatiana
2 / 50 shared
Bruno, Giovanni
2 / 107 shared
Surmenev, Roman
1 / 8 shared
Panin, Alexey
1 / 2 shared
Sjöström, William
1 / 4 shared
Surmeneva, Maria
1 / 7 shared
Evsevleev, Sergei
1 / 19 shared
Kennedy, Andrew R.
1 / 16 shared
Koptyug, A.
1 / 6 shared
Epple, M.
1 / 16 shared
Khrapov, D.
1 / 6 shared
Léonard, Fabien
1 / 15 shared
Surmenev, R.
1 / 9 shared
Manabaev, K.
1 / 2 shared
Surmeneva, M.
1 / 9 shared
Loza, K.
1 / 10 shared
Monk, Stephen David
1 / 1 shared
Ingham, Joshua
1 / 1 shared
Prewett, Philip D.
1 / 2 shared
Naik, Jay P.
1 / 1 shared
Kaklamani, Georgina
1 / 1 shared
Pape, L.
1 / 2 shared
Carrozza, M. C.
1 / 1 shared
Kazerounian, S.
1 / 1 shared
Oddo, C. M.
1 / 1 shared
Kaklamani, Georgia
1 / 5 shared
Adams, Michael J.
2 / 3 shared
Anthony, Carl J.
1 / 2 shared
Grover, Liam M.
1 / 11 shared
Mehrban, Nazia
1 / 6 shared
Ward, Michael C. L.
1 / 1 shared
Evans, Stephen D.
1 / 4 shared
Górzny, Marcin
1 / 1 shared
Chart of publication period
2024
2021
2020
2019
2017
2016
2014
2013
2011

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Vicary, James
  • Bowen, James
  • Khrapov, Dmitry
  • Koptyug, Andrey
  • Meinel, Dietmar
  • Kozadayeva, Maria
  • Manabaev, Kayrat
  • Mishurova, Tatiana
  • Bruno, Giovanni
  • Surmenev, Roman
  • Panin, Alexey
  • Sjöström, William
  • Surmeneva, Maria
  • Evsevleev, Sergei
  • Kennedy, Andrew R.
  • Koptyug, A.
  • Epple, M.
  • Khrapov, D.
  • Léonard, Fabien
  • Surmenev, R.
  • Manabaev, K.
  • Surmeneva, M.
  • Loza, K.
  • Monk, Stephen David
  • Ingham, Joshua
  • Prewett, Philip D.
  • Naik, Jay P.
  • Kaklamani, Georgina
  • Pape, L.
  • Carrozza, M. C.
  • Kazerounian, S.
  • Oddo, C. M.
  • Kaklamani, Georgia
  • Adams, Michael J.
  • Anthony, Carl J.
  • Grover, Liam M.
  • Mehrban, Nazia
  • Ward, Michael C. L.
  • Evans, Stephen D.
  • Górzny, Marcin
OrganizationsLocationPeople

document

Manufacture and calibration of high stiffness AFM cantilevers

  • Cheneler, David
  • Vicary, James
  • Bowen, James
Abstract

Atomic force microscopy (AFM) employs microfabricated cantilevers as sensing elements, which are used to measure surface topography and interaction forces. The flexible free end of a cantilever often presents either a pyramidal tip or a colloid probe particle. Cantilevers are traditionally V-shapedor rectangular, and are generally fabricated from Si or SixNy. Laser light is reflected off the free end of the cantilever onto a position-sensitive photodetector (PSD). AFM force measurement studies began in earnest during the early 1990s, followed by significant efforts to accurately calibrate the mechanical properties of the cantilever. These efforts centred on understanding the beam mechanics, in particular the flexibility of the free end, where the tip or colloid probe is situated.Force measurements have been applied to a wide variety of scientific and engineering disciplines, and across many industrial sectors. For many studies, the use of colloid probes or chemical functionalisation permits the selective study of a particular material/material interaction, often under non-ambient environments. Force measurements can provide information regarding sample mechanical properties, during the tip/sample approach, as well as adhesive properties, during the tip/sample separation. The spring constant is a measure of the cantilever stiffness, i.e. the resistance to bending. The spring constant of a rectangular cantilever can be estimated using Euler-Bernoulli beam theory. Once calibrated, the spring constant is used in calculations in order to convert normal (i.e. vertical) deflections into normal forces using Hooke's law.The range of AFM cantilevers commercially manufactured means that spring constants in the approximate range 0.001 to 100 N/m are available. Deflections in the range 0.1-100 nm are typically measurable on the PSD, and hence forces can be measured in the picoNewton to microNewton range. Accurate control of the beam thickness during fabrication is particularly difficult to achieve, due to the nature of the etching process employed. The width and length of the beam are generally much more reliable and repeatable. Given the sensitivity of the spring constant to the beam thickness, typically proportional to (thickness)3, accurate calibration is a necessity for accurate force measurements.We are currently calibrating 40 different designs of rectangular AFM cantilever, designed using Timoshenko beam theory, manufactured from Si. The various designs incorporate a range of widths, lengths, and thicknesses. These cantilevers are expected to exhibit spring constants in the range 100 to 10,000 N/m. This would afford researchers the opportunity to perform adhesion, indentation, and tribological testing with normal loads approaching 1 mN, whilst retaining the displacement resolution of the AFM. We present the latest results of this project, including measured cantilever resonant frequencies and calculated spring constants, which are compared to analytic expressions and finite element models.

Topics
  • impedance spectroscopy
  • surface
  • theory
  • atomic force microscopy
  • etching