People | Locations | Statistics |
---|---|---|
Naji, M. |
| |
Motta, Antonella |
| |
Aletan, Dirar |
| |
Mohamed, Tarek |
| |
Ertürk, Emre |
| |
Taccardi, Nicola |
| |
Kononenko, Denys |
| |
Petrov, R. H. | Madrid |
|
Alshaaer, Mazen | Brussels |
|
Bih, L. |
| |
Casati, R. |
| |
Muller, Hermance |
| |
Kočí, Jan | Prague |
|
Šuljagić, Marija |
| |
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-Artemi | Brussels |
|
Azam, Siraj |
| |
Ospanova, Alyiya |
| |
Blanpain, Bart |
| |
Ali, M. A. |
| |
Popa, V. |
| |
Rančić, M. |
| |
Ollier, Nadège |
| |
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro |
| |
Landes, Michael |
| |
Rignanese, Gian-Marco |
|
Griffith, Michael
in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%
Topics
Publications (5/5 displayed)
- 2017Two-way cavity clay brick masonry walls tested in-situ
- 2016Flexural behaviour of FRP strengthened brick cavity walls
- 2014In situ out-of-plane testing of as-built and retrofitted unreinforced masonry wallscitations
- 2014Detailed seismic assessment and improvement procedure for vintage flexible timber diaphragms
- 2010In-situ testing of a residential unreinforced masonry building located in New Zealand
Places of action
Organizations | Location | People |
---|
document
Flexural behaviour of FRP strengthened brick cavity walls
Abstract
The seismic vulnerability of unreinforced masonry (URM) walls to out-of-plane loading is widely acknowledged. Much research has been undertaken to develop practical techniques to provide ade-quate flexural strength for these URM walls which are often an integral part of the gravity load resisting struc-ture. In solid URM walls, the surface treatments that provide tensile capacity to the wall have been shown to be very effective flexural retrofit techniques. Cavity wall construction, on the other hand, has received little attention and surface treatments are not possible to the inner faces of the two leaves of construction. This pa-per presents the results of preliminary tests of two techniques with the aim of enabling near surface mounted FRP reinforcement on the external faces of unreinforced clay brick cavity walls to work under full reverse cy-clic loading. In these experiments, one system used expanding foam in the cavity to maintain the cavity di-mension and prevent the cavity ties from buckling under compression forces and the second system investi-gated the use of heavier duty metal connecters that could withstand the compression forces without buckling.