Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Griffith, Michael

  • Google
  • 5
  • 9
  • 42

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (5/5 displayed)

  • 2017Two-way cavity clay brick masonry walls tested in-situcitations
  • 2016Flexural behaviour of FRP strengthened brick cavity wallscitations
  • 2014In situ out-of-plane testing of as-built and retrofitted unreinforced masonry walls42citations
  • 2014Detailed seismic assessment and improvement procedure for vintage flexible timber diaphragmscitations
  • 2010In-situ testing of a residential unreinforced masonry building located in New Zealandcitations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Derakhshan, Hossein
5 / 6 shared
Lucas, Wade
2 / 2 shared
Dizhur, Dmytro
3 / 5 shared
Ingham, Jason
3 / 6 shared
Tomasi, Roberto
1 / 1 shared
Quenneville, Pierre
1 / 2 shared
Wilson, Aaron
1 / 1 shared
Giongo, Ivan
1 / 2 shared
Lumantarna, Ronald
1 / 2 shared
Chart of publication period
2017
2016
2014
2010

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Derakhshan, Hossein
  • Lucas, Wade
  • Dizhur, Dmytro
  • Ingham, Jason
  • Tomasi, Roberto
  • Quenneville, Pierre
  • Wilson, Aaron
  • Giongo, Ivan
  • Lumantarna, Ronald
OrganizationsLocationPeople

document

Flexural behaviour of FRP strengthened brick cavity walls

  • Derakhshan, Hossein
  • Griffith, Michael
  • Lucas, Wade
Abstract

The seismic vulnerability of unreinforced masonry (URM) walls to out-of-plane loading is widely acknowledged. Much research has been undertaken to develop practical techniques to provide ade-quate flexural strength for these URM walls which are often an integral part of the gravity load resisting struc-ture. In solid URM walls, the surface treatments that provide tensile capacity to the wall have been shown to be very effective flexural retrofit techniques. Cavity wall construction, on the other hand, has received little attention and surface treatments are not possible to the inner faces of the two leaves of construction. This pa-per presents the results of preliminary tests of two techniques with the aim of enabling near surface mounted FRP reinforcement on the external faces of unreinforced clay brick cavity walls to work under full reverse cy-clic loading. In these experiments, one system used expanding foam in the cavity to maintain the cavity di-mension and prevent the cavity ties from buckling under compression forces and the second system investi-gated the use of heavier duty metal connecters that could withstand the compression forces without buckling.

Topics
  • impedance spectroscopy
  • surface
  • experiment
  • strength
  • flexural strength