Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Derakhshan, Hossein

  • Google
  • 6
  • 9
  • 42

Accademia di Belle Arti di Urbino

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (6/6 displayed)

  • 2017Two-way cavity clay brick masonry walls tested in-situcitations
  • 2016Flexural behaviour of FRP strengthened brick cavity wallscitations
  • 2014In situ out-of-plane testing of as-built and retrofitted unreinforced masonry walls42citations
  • 2014Detailed seismic assessment and improvement procedure for vintage flexible timber diaphragmscitations
  • 2010Earthquake-damaged unreinforced masonry building tested in-situcitations
  • 2010In-situ testing of a residential unreinforced masonry building located in New Zealandcitations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Griffith, Michael
5 / 5 shared
Lucas, Wade
2 / 2 shared
Dizhur, Dmytro
4 / 5 shared
Ingham, Jason
4 / 6 shared
Tomasi, Roberto
1 / 1 shared
Quenneville, Pierre
1 / 2 shared
Wilson, Aaron
1 / 1 shared
Giongo, Ivan
1 / 2 shared
Lumantarna, Ronald
2 / 2 shared
Chart of publication period
2017
2016
2014
2010

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Griffith, Michael
  • Lucas, Wade
  • Dizhur, Dmytro
  • Ingham, Jason
  • Tomasi, Roberto
  • Quenneville, Pierre
  • Wilson, Aaron
  • Giongo, Ivan
  • Lumantarna, Ronald
OrganizationsLocationPeople

article

Earthquake-damaged unreinforced masonry building tested in-situ

  • Derakhshan, Hossein
  • Dizhur, Dmytro
  • Lumantarna, Ronald
  • Ingham, Jason
Abstract

In December 2007 a magnitude 6.8 earthquake had an epicentre located approximately 50 km from the city of Gisborne, New Zealand. This earthquake caused damage to a number of buildings in Gisborne, and in particular, to numerous unreinforced masonry buildings. One such building was damaged to the extent that significant post-earthquake repairs were necessary, and partial removal of two of the building’s gable ended walls was required. This reconstruction provided an opportunity for a team of researchers from the University of Auckland to conduct field tests on the building, allowing comparison with companion testing that had previously been undertaken in a laboratory setting. This field testing involved the extraction of clay brick and mortar samples, in-situ bed joint shear tests, diagonal shear tests on samples extracted from the gabled walls, an in-situ in-plane shear test and out-of-plane testing of a gable ended wall both in the as-built condition and after the installation of a near-surface mounted (NSM) carbon fibre reinforced polymer (CFRP) retrofit solution. Testing confirmed that the boundary conditions in real buildings can significantly affect experimental response, with vertical restraint resulting in a large increase in out-of-plane load capacity, and also confirmed that the near-surface mounted FRP solution is an excellent low invasive option for seismic strengthening of unreinforced masonry walls. Details of the history of the building, and the methods used to undertake the field testing are reported, and experimental results are presented.

Topics
  • impedance spectroscopy
  • surface
  • polymer
  • Carbon
  • extraction
  • shear test