Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Griffith, Michael

  • Google
  • 5
  • 9
  • 42

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (5/5 displayed)

  • 2017Two-way cavity clay brick masonry walls tested in-situcitations
  • 2016Flexural behaviour of FRP strengthened brick cavity wallscitations
  • 2014In situ out-of-plane testing of as-built and retrofitted unreinforced masonry walls42citations
  • 2014Detailed seismic assessment and improvement procedure for vintage flexible timber diaphragmscitations
  • 2010In-situ testing of a residential unreinforced masonry building located in New Zealandcitations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Derakhshan, Hossein
5 / 6 shared
Lucas, Wade
2 / 2 shared
Dizhur, Dmytro
3 / 5 shared
Ingham, Jason
3 / 6 shared
Tomasi, Roberto
1 / 1 shared
Quenneville, Pierre
1 / 2 shared
Wilson, Aaron
1 / 1 shared
Giongo, Ivan
1 / 2 shared
Lumantarna, Ronald
1 / 2 shared
Chart of publication period
2017
2016
2014
2010

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Derakhshan, Hossein
  • Lucas, Wade
  • Dizhur, Dmytro
  • Ingham, Jason
  • Tomasi, Roberto
  • Quenneville, Pierre
  • Wilson, Aaron
  • Giongo, Ivan
  • Lumantarna, Ronald
OrganizationsLocationPeople

document

In-situ testing of a residential unreinforced masonry building located in New Zealand

  • Derakhshan, Hossein
  • Dizhur, Dmytro
  • Lumantarna, Ronald
  • Griffith, Michael
  • Ingham, Jason
Abstract

Most research considering seismic assessment of URM walls has been conducted using laboratory-based studies with well defined but artificial boundary conditions. Thus, in-situ testing is required to provide data with which to validate the accuracy of laboratory-based studies of URM walls. Alterations, major refurbishment and structural seismic strengthening of Avon House, located in Wellington, New Zealand, involved demolition and removal of three large wall sections, allowing an opportunity for a team of researchers from the University of Auckland to conduct in-situ testing on the building. This allowed comparison with companion experiments that had previously been undertaken in a laboratory setting and provided an accurate seismic assessment of the building. This field testing involved the extraction of clay brick and mortar samples, in-situ bed joint shear tests, flexural bond tests, in-situ diagonal tension (shear) tests, and out-of-plane testing of the walls both in the existing condition and after the installation of a near-surface mounted (NSM) carbon fibre reinforced polymer (CFRP) retrofit solution. Testing confirmed that the walls in Avon House did not meet current New Zealand seismic performance requirements, and also confirmed that the near-surface mounted FRP solution is an excellent low-invasive option for seismic strengthening of unreinforced masonry buildings. Details of the history of the building, and the methods used to undertake the field testing are reported, and experimental results are presented.

Topics
  • impedance spectroscopy
  • surface
  • polymer
  • Carbon
  • experiment
  • extraction
  • shear test
  • in-situ testing