People | Locations | Statistics |
---|---|---|
Naji, M. |
| |
Motta, Antonella |
| |
Aletan, Dirar |
| |
Mohamed, Tarek |
| |
Ertürk, Emre |
| |
Taccardi, Nicola |
| |
Kononenko, Denys |
| |
Petrov, R. H. | Madrid |
|
Alshaaer, Mazen | Brussels |
|
Bih, L. |
| |
Casati, R. |
| |
Muller, Hermance |
| |
Kočí, Jan | Prague |
|
Šuljagić, Marija |
| |
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-Artemi | Brussels |
|
Azam, Siraj |
| |
Ospanova, Alyiya |
| |
Blanpain, Bart |
| |
Ali, M. A. |
| |
Popa, V. |
| |
Rančić, M. |
| |
Ollier, Nadège |
| |
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro |
| |
Landes, Michael |
| |
Rignanese, Gian-Marco |
|
Janezic, Michael D.
in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%
Topics
Publications (2/2 displayed)
Places of action
Organizations | Location | People |
---|
document
Split-post and split-cylinder resonator techniques: A comparison of complex permittivity measurement of dielectric substrates
Abstract
<p>We overview two nondestructive techniques, the split-post and split-cylinder resonator, which are under consideration as standard test methods for measuring the relative permittivity and loss tangent of bare low-temperature co-fired ceramic (LTCC) substrates over the frequency range of 1 to 30 GHz. The capabilities and limitations of the split-post and split-cylinder resonator are outlined, and the level of agreement between the two techniques is examined through comparison of the relative permittivity and loss tangent measurements of a fused silica and an LTCC substrate.</p>