Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Jones, B.

  • Google
  • 1
  • 5
  • 0

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (1/1 displayed)

  • 2004Development of metallic digital strain gaugescitations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
White, Nm
1 / 23 shared
Rakowski, R.
1 / 1 shared
Tudor, Mj
1 / 20 shared
Yan, T.
1 / 3 shared
Beeby, Steve
1 / 45 shared
Chart of publication period
2004

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • White, Nm
  • Rakowski, R.
  • Tudor, Mj
  • Yan, T.
  • Beeby, Steve
OrganizationsLocationPeople

document

Development of metallic digital strain gauges

  • White, Nm
  • Rakowski, R.
  • Tudor, Mj
  • Jones, B.
  • Yan, T.
  • Beeby, Steve
Abstract

Metallic resistive strain gauges are widely used in measuring devices for physical quantities such as load, pressure and torque. The gauges are bonded to the surface of the sensing structure at strategic points to obtain an appropriate level of strain. Typically in a load cell the strains at the gauges do not exceed 1500 microstrain at the rated load. With a four-gauge fully active Wheatstone bridge circuit, a nominal output signal is about 3 mV/V of bridge excitation for the maximum level of 1500 microstrain at the full load, based upon a gauge factor of 2. If the bridge excitation voltage is 10 V, which is determined by the gauge resistance, the gauge grid area and the heat-sink characteristics of the load cell material, the maximum output voltage of the bridge at the full load will be about 30 mV. Despite many favourable factors of the metallic resistive strain gauges, the limiting factors are that the output signals are quite low and very often the measurement accuracy is limited by the signal-to-noise ratio. Also the installation of strain gauges is normally labour intensive. Furthermore, to obtain a measurable output signal, the surface strain is usually designed to approach the proportional elastic limit of the sensing structure. For this reason strain-gauges-based load cells can seldom withstand overloads of more than double the rated full range load. Strain gauges have for many years been the primary sensors in the fields of measurement for load, pressure and torque. However, some instrument manufacturers of load, pressure and torque measurement devices have moved away from using resistive strain gauges. Since early 1980’s, Shinko Denshi Co. Ltd. has developed metallic resonant tuning fork balance and since early 1990’s, Avery Berkel and Weigh-Tronix (now Avery Weigh-Tronix) have developed quartz resonant tuning fork weighing scales, and Druck Ltd has developed silicon resonant pressure sensors. Further commercial developments are taking place to enhance device manufacturability, to enable wireless/batteryless operation of the resonant sensors, and to make measurement on stiff structures at much lower strain levels possible.<br/>A resonant sensor is a device with an element vibrating at resonance of which the resonance frequency is a function of the measurand. The output of a resonant sensor is a quasi-digital frequency signal, which does not require accurate measurement of the amplitude of the analogue voltage signal. The frequency signal is compatible with digital circuitry eliminating the need for analogue-to-digital conversion. The resolution achievable using a resonant sensor is much higher than alternative strain gauge sensors as the frequency can be measured with greater accuracy, for example the resonance frequency of the quartz tuning fork in watches is used as an accurate time base. Resonant sensors also have good long-term stability since the resonance frequency is not dependent on the amplitude of the electrical signals, but rather the mechanical properties of the sensor element. Resonator sensors often have a high mechanical quality factor (Q-factor), which leads to a high sensitivity and low power consumption. Resonant sensors have been made in a wide range of types, sizes and materials. This paper reports upon the development of metallic resonant sensors based on a triple-beam tuning fork structure with thick-film printed piezoelectric elements.

Topics
  • impedance spectroscopy
  • surface
  • Silicon
  • weighing