Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Serati, Mehdi

  • Google
  • 4
  • 9
  • 0

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (4/4 displayed)

  • 2024Shear Strength and Consolidation Behaviour of Kaolin Clay Reinforced with a Granular Column Backfilled with Crushed Waste Glasscitations
  • 2024Correction: Shear Strength and Consolidation Behaviour of Kaolin Clay Reinforced with a Granular Column Backfilled with Crushed Waste Glasscitations
  • 2020A comparative study on shear strength of crushed waste glass with natural and manufactured sandcitations
  • 2020A comparative study on shear strength of crushed waste glass with natural and manufactured sandcitations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Grizi, Athina
2 / 2 shared
Cheng, Yi
2 / 2 shared
Javadi, Akbar
2 / 3 shared
Williams, David
2 / 4 shared
Qasim, Sadaf
4 / 4 shared
Williams, David J.
2 / 2 shared
Kazmi, Danish
2 / 2 shared
Cheng, Yi Pik
2 / 2 shared
Olaya, Sebastian Quintero
1 / 1 shared
Chart of publication period
2024
2020

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Grizi, Athina
  • Cheng, Yi
  • Javadi, Akbar
  • Williams, David
  • Qasim, Sadaf
  • Williams, David J.
  • Kazmi, Danish
  • Cheng, Yi Pik
  • Olaya, Sebastian Quintero
OrganizationsLocationPeople

document

A comparative study on shear strength of crushed waste glass with natural and manufactured sand

  • Williams, David J.
  • Qasim, Sadaf
  • Kazmi, Danish
  • Cheng, Yi Pik
  • Serati, Mehdi
Abstract

This study compares the shear strength behavior of crushed waste glass (CWG) with that of traditionally-used natural and manufactured sand. Direct shear experiments were performed under dry and wet conditions at seven applied normal stresses ranging from 6.8 to 436.0 kPa. The experiments were performed in two series. Firstly, the peak friction angle of the as-received materials was tested. Shear strength testing was then performed on modified materials with a constant maximum particle size of 600 microns, to eliminate the effect of larger particles on the shear strength test results. It was observed that the friction angle of manufactured sand and CWG decreased when their maximum particle size was reduced. Manufactured sand had the highest wet friction angle, followed by CWG and natural sand. Interestingly, it was observed that the friction angle of CWG was higher under wet conditions compared to that under dry conditions, which is contrary to the expected behavior of sands and indicates a relatively superior shear strength behavior of CWG under saturated conditions. Overall, it was concluded that CWG showed friction angles comparable to those of natural and manufactured sand; indicating that CWG could potentially act as an alternative to depleting natural sand in various geotechnical applications, ultimately contributing to the transition towards a circular economy.

Topics
  • impedance spectroscopy
  • experiment
  • glass
  • glass
  • strength