Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Lepikko, Sakari

  • Google
  • 5
  • 27
  • 48

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (5/5 displayed)

  • 2024Smoothening Perfluoroalkylated Surfaces : Liquid-Like Despite Molecular Rigidity?citations
  • 2022Solid-state polymer adsorption for surface modification: The role of molecular weight13citations
  • 2020Conformality of TMA/H2O and TMA/O3 processes evaluated using lateral high aspect ratio structurescitations
  • 2018Comparative analysis of ceramic-carbonate nanocomposite fuel cells using composite GDC/NLC electrolyte with different perovskite structured cathode materials16citations
  • 2018Biobased aerogels with different surface charge as electrolyte carrier membranes in quantum dot-sensitized solar cell19citations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Koochak, Parham
1 / 1 shared
Ras, Robin H. A.
2 / 13 shared
Wong, William S. Y.
1 / 3 shared
Kiseleva, Mariia S.
1 / 1 shared
Latikka, Mika
1 / 1 shared
Mihhels, Karl
1 / 5 shared
Johnson, C. Magnus
1 / 1 shared
Kotov, Nikolay
1 / 1 shared
Xu, Wenyang
1 / 6 shared
Kontturi, Eero
1 / 28 shared
Ras, Robin
1 / 4 shared
Pettersson, Torbjörn
1 / 6 shared
Verkama, Emma
1 / 2 shared
Riikka, L. Puurunen
1 / 2 shared
Yim, Jihong
1 / 3 shared
Utriainen, Mikko
1 / 11 shared
Patakangas, Janne
1 / 5 shared
Halme, Janne
1 / 10 shared
Lund, Peter D.
2 / 56 shared
Asghar, Imran
1 / 5 shared
Subramanian, Vaidyanathan Ravi
1 / 1 shared
Lehtonen, Janika
1 / 5 shared
Greca, Luiz G.
1 / 11 shared
Miettunen, Kati
1 / 16 shared
Borghei, Maryam
1 / 16 shared
Tardy, Blaise L.
1 / 15 shared
Poskela, Aapo
1 / 3 shared
Chart of publication period
2024
2022
2020
2018

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Koochak, Parham
  • Ras, Robin H. A.
  • Wong, William S. Y.
  • Kiseleva, Mariia S.
  • Latikka, Mika
  • Mihhels, Karl
  • Johnson, C. Magnus
  • Kotov, Nikolay
  • Xu, Wenyang
  • Kontturi, Eero
  • Ras, Robin
  • Pettersson, Torbjörn
  • Verkama, Emma
  • Riikka, L. Puurunen
  • Yim, Jihong
  • Utriainen, Mikko
  • Patakangas, Janne
  • Halme, Janne
  • Lund, Peter D.
  • Asghar, Imran
  • Subramanian, Vaidyanathan Ravi
  • Lehtonen, Janika
  • Greca, Luiz G.
  • Miettunen, Kati
  • Borghei, Maryam
  • Tardy, Blaise L.
  • Poskela, Aapo
OrganizationsLocationPeople

document

Conformality of TMA/H2O and TMA/O3 processes evaluated using lateral high aspect ratio structures

  • Lepikko, Sakari
  • Ras, Robin H. A.
  • Verkama, Emma
  • Riikka, L. Puurunen
  • Yim, Jihong
  • Utriainen, Mikko
Abstract

Atomic layer deposition (ALD) is a fast-growing technique in manufacturing modern electronics due to its ability to produce uniform and conformal thin films with sub-nanometer precision even within high-aspect-ratio cavities. However, reaction kinetics and deposition parameters set the limits how deep the film can be grown conformally within a high-aspect-ratio structure. In this work, we use lateral high-aspect-ratio structure for comparison of thickness profiles of two aluminum oxide Al2O3 deposition processes: trimethylaluminum Al(CH3)3 (TMA) with either water H2O (denoted as TMA/H2O) or ozone O3 (denoted as TMA/O3) as co-reactants. The processes are performed with Veeco-CNT Savannah S200 ALD reactor on PillarHall® LHAR3 test structures in otherwise the same conditions except for the co-reactant pulse. This structure has a lateral trench with gap height of 500 nm and depth of 1 mm, resulting in aspect ratio of 2000.<br/>The thickness profiles obtained with spectroscopic reflectometry show four main differences between the processes. The initial plateau at low depths describes the growth per cycle (GPC). It is 30% higher for TMA/H2O than for TMA/ O3. Since the TMA dose is the same in both processes, we conclude that O3 generates less hydroxyl groups than H2O, which affects GPC [1]. The plateau is followed by a steep slope. The slope at half-thickness value is related to the sticking coefficient of limiting reactant [2]. The slope in this case corresponds to the sticking coefficient of TMA in both processes, indicating that TMA is the limiting reactant in these deposition conditions. The depth of half-thickness value describes the diffusion length of the reactants under the deposition conditions. This value is slightly higher for TMA/O3 even though the limiting TMA dose is the same in both processes. TMA/O3 diffuses therefore slightly longer into trenches than TMA/H2O. However, the total volume of deposited film remains smaller for TMA/O3 due to smaller GPC. The total area beneath the thickness profile curve, which equals to cross-sectional area of the film, for TMA/O3 is 20% smaller than for TMA/H2O.<br/>Lastly, TMA/H2O is compared to another TMA/H2O process deposited in Picosun R-150 ALD reactor on a similar PillarHall® structure [3]. The processes are otherwise nearly identical except for half-thickness depth. This is due to larger dose used in the Picosun reactor increasing the diffusion length of precursors.

Topics
  • impedance spectroscopy
  • thin film
  • aluminum oxide
  • aluminium
  • laser emission spectroscopy
  • atomic layer deposition
  • reflectometry