Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Spohn, T.

  • Google
  • 7
  • 20
  • 183

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (7/7 displayed)

  • 2019The Thermal, Mechanical, Structural, and Dielectric Properties of Cometary Nuclei After Rosetta91citations
  • 2014Internal state of Lutetia as a function of the macroporositycitations
  • 2014Core and crust formation on Vesta: Controlling factorscitations
  • 2014Modeling of planetesimal compaction by hot pressingcitations
  • 2014Controls on the differentiation of Vestacitations
  • 2012Numerical modelling of accretion, sintering and differentiation of asteroid 4 Vestacitations
  • 2012Differentiation and core formation in accreting planetesimals92citations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Tosi, F.
1 / 5 shared
Ciarletti, V.
1 / 5 shared
Skorov, Y.
1 / 1 shared
Filacchione, G.
1 / 3 shared
Pelivan, I.
1 / 1 shared
Marshall, D.
1 / 1 shared
Knollenberg, J.
1 / 1 shared
Knapmeyer, M.
1 / 1 shared
Gundlach, B.
1 / 1 shared
Fischer, H.-H.
1 / 1 shared
Davidsson, B.
1 / 1 shared
Brouet, Y.
1 / 5 shared
Attree, N.
1 / 1 shared
Leyrat, C.
1 / 4 shared
Groussin, O.
1 / 2 shared
Snodgrass, Colin
1 / 1 shared
Kokotanekova, Rosita
1 / 1 shared
Kührt, E.
1 / 1 shared
Neumann, Wladimir
6 / 7 shared
Breuer, D.
6 / 8 shared
Chart of publication period
2019
2014
2012

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Tosi, F.
  • Ciarletti, V.
  • Skorov, Y.
  • Filacchione, G.
  • Pelivan, I.
  • Marshall, D.
  • Knollenberg, J.
  • Knapmeyer, M.
  • Gundlach, B.
  • Fischer, H.-H.
  • Davidsson, B.
  • Brouet, Y.
  • Attree, N.
  • Leyrat, C.
  • Groussin, O.
  • Snodgrass, Colin
  • Kokotanekova, Rosita
  • Kührt, E.
  • Neumann, Wladimir
  • Breuer, D.
OrganizationsLocationPeople

document

Modeling of planetesimal compaction by hot pressing

  • Neumann, Wladimir
  • Spohn, T.
  • Breuer, D.
Abstract

Compaction of initially porous material prior to melting is an important process that has influenced the interior structure and the thermal evolution of planetesimals in their early history. On one hand, compaction decreases the porosity resulting in a reduction of the radius. On the other hand, the loss of porosity results in an increase of the thermal conductivity of the material and, thus, in a more efficient cooling. Porosity loss by hot pressing is the most efficient process of compaction in planetesimals and can be described by creep flow, which depends on temperature and stress. Hot pressing has been repeatedly modeled using a simplified approach, for which the porosity is gradually reduced in some fixed temperature interval between ~650 K and 700 K [see e.g. 1--3]. This approach neglects the dependence of compaction on stress. In the present study [see 4], we compare this ''parametrized'' method with a self-consistent calculation of porosity loss via a ''creep-related'' approach. We use our thermal evolution model from previous studies [5] to model compaction of an initially porous ordinary chondritic body and consider four basic packings of spherical dust grains (simple cubic, orthorhombic, rhombohedral, and body-centered cubic). Depending on the grain packing, we calculate the effective stress and the associated porosity change via the thermally activated creep flow. For comparison, compaction is also modeled by simply reducing the initial porosity linearly to zero between 650 and 700 K. Since we are interested in thermal metamorphism and not melting, we only consider bodies that experience a maximum temperature below the solidus temperature of the metal phase. For the creep related approach, the temperature interval in which compaction takes place depends strongly on the size of the planetesimal and is not fixed as assumed in the parametrized approach. Depending on the radius, the initial grain size, the activation energy, the initial porosity, and the specific packing of the dust grains, the temperature interval lies within 600--1200 K. This finding implies that the parametrized approach strongly overestimates compaction and underestimates the maximal temperature. For the cases considered, the post-compaction porous layer retained at the surface, is a factor of 2.5 to 4.5 thicker for the creep-related approach. The difference in the temperature evolution between the two approaches increases with decreasing radius, and the maximal temperature can deviate by about 40 % for small bodies....

Topics
  • porous
  • impedance spectroscopy
  • surface
  • grain
  • grain size
  • phase
  • activation
  • porosity
  • thermal conductivity
  • creep
  • hot pressing