| People | Locations | Statistics |
|---|---|---|
| Naji, M. |
| |
| Motta, Antonella |
| |
| Aletan, Dirar |
| |
| Mohamed, Tarek |
| |
| Ertürk, Emre |
| |
| Taccardi, Nicola |
| |
| Kononenko, Denys |
| |
| Petrov, R. H. | Madrid |
|
| Alshaaer, Mazen | Brussels |
|
| Bih, L. |
| |
| Casati, R. |
| |
| Muller, Hermance |
| |
| Kočí, Jan | Prague |
|
| Šuljagić, Marija |
| |
| Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-Artemi | Brussels |
|
| Azam, Siraj |
| |
| Ospanova, Alyiya |
| |
| Blanpain, Bart |
| |
| Ali, M. A. |
| |
| Popa, V. |
| |
| Rančić, M. |
| |
| Ollier, Nadège |
| |
| Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro |
| |
| Landes, Michael |
| |
| Rignanese, Gian-Marco |
|
Lee, Koon-Yang
Imperial College London
in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%
Topics
Publications (23/23 displayed)
- 2023Predicting filling efficiency of composite resin injection repaircitations
- 2021<i>Komagataeibacter</i> Tool Kit (KTK): A Modular Cloning System for Multigene Constructs and Programmed Protein Secretion from Cellulose Producing Bacteria.citations
- 2020Nanomaterials Derived from Fungal Sources-Is It the New Hype?citations
- 2020Upcycling Poultry Feathers with (Nano)cellulose:Sustainable Composites Derived from Nonwoven Whole Feather Preformscitations
- 2020High porosity cellulose nanopapers as reinforcement in multi-layer epoxy laminatescitations
- 2019Nanocellulose reinforced polymer composites: Computational analysis of structure-mechanical properties relationshipscitations
- 2019Cationic starch as strengthening agent in nanofibrillated and bacterial cellulose nanopapers
- 2019Nanomaterials Derived from Fungal Sources - Is It the New Hype?citations
- 2018Better togethercitations
- 2018Thinner and better: (Ultra-)low grammage bacterial cellulose nanopaper-reinforced polylactide composite laminates
- 2017Sample geometry dependency on the measured tensile properties of cellulose nanopaperscitations
- 2016Understanding the Dispersion and Assembly of Bacterial Cellulose in Organic Solventscitations
- 2016Ductile unidirectional continuous rayon fibre-reinforced hierarchical compositescitations
- 2014Bacterial Cellulose Nanopaper as Reinforcement for Polylactide Compositescitations
- 2014Aligned unidirectional PLA/bacterial cellulose nanocomposite fibre reinforced PDLLA compositescitations
- 2014On the use of nanocellulose as reinforcement in polymer matrix compositescitations
- 2013Porous copolymers of ε-caprolactone as scaffolds for tissue engineeringcitations
- 2012Nano-fibrillated cellulose vs bacterial cellulose
- 2012Carbon Fiber: Properties, Testing, and Analysiscitations
- 2012Interfaces in Cross-Linked and Grafted Bacterial Cellulose/Poly(Lactic Acid) Resin Compositescitations
- 2012Nano-fibrillated cellulose vs bacterial cellulose:Reinforcing ability of nanocellulose obtained topdown or bottom-up
- 2009Renewable nanocomposite polymer foams synthesized from Pickering emulsion templatescitations
- 2009Surface functionalisation of bacterial cellulose as the route to produce green polylactide nanocomposites with improved propertiescitations
Places of action
| Organizations | Location | People |
|---|
document
Nano-fibrillated cellulose vs bacterial cellulose
Abstract
This work investigates the difference between nanofibrillated cellulose (NFC) and bacterial cellulose (BC). BC possesses higher critical surface tension of 57 mN m-1 compared to NFC (41 mN m-1). The thermal degradation temperature of BC was also found to be higher than that of NFC, in both nitrogen and air atmosphere. These results are in good agreement with the higher crystallinity of BC based on area under the XRD spectra, measured to be 71% as compared to NFC of 41%. Both types of nanocellulose papers were found to possess similar tensile moduli and strengths of 12 GPa and 100 MPa, respectively. Nanocomposites were manufactured by infusing the nanocellulose paper with an epoxy resin using vacuum assisted resin infusion. The cellulose reinforced epoxy nanocomposites were found to possess a stiffness and strength of approximately ∼8 GPa and ∼100 MPa at an equivalent fibre volume fraction of 60 vol.-%. In terms of the reinforcing ability of NFC and BC in a polymer matrix, no significant difference between NFC and BC was observed.