Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Schouten, Jaap

  • Google
  • 1
  • 3
  • 0

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (1/1 displayed)

  • 2014CONTINOUS MULTI-PHASE FLOW REACTOR FOR SMALL AND LARGE FLOW CAPACITIES THAN L/MINcitations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Nijhuis, T. Alexander
1 / 1 shared
Al-Rawashdeh, Mamoun
1 / 1 shared
Yue, Jun
1 / 3 shared
Chart of publication period
2014

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Nijhuis, T. Alexander
  • Al-Rawashdeh, Mamoun
  • Yue, Jun
OrganizationsLocationPeople

document

CONTINOUS MULTI-PHASE FLOW REACTOR FOR SMALL AND LARGE FLOW CAPACITIES THAN L/MIN

  • Schouten, Jaap
  • Nijhuis, T. Alexander
  • Al-Rawashdeh, Mamoun
  • Yue, Jun
Abstract

Multiphase flow processing in flow reactors holds great promises for diverse applications in fine chemicals and materials synthesis primarily due to its precise control over the flow, mixing and reaction inside or between each phase. Even though, flow reactors have shown superior performance, so far batch reactors still dominating the landscape for industrial manufacturing in the pharmaceutical and fine chemicals. Nonetheless, the base of switching to continuous flow reactors is making its way. Recently, a good article has been published which summaries the complexity of introducing new disruptive technology and why flow reactors are taking so much time to make itindustrial scale manufacturing. (1). One of these factors is the need to reduce the investment and technological risks of scale-up which we address here.<br/>In this paper, we present an effort into developing a scale-up methodology to smoothly bridge the gap between continuous flow laboratory reactors and those for industrial scale manufacturing. The methodology relies on the concept of numbering-up, placing multiple reaction channels in parallel to increase the flow capacity rather than scaling-up the reaction channel dimensions. The key to this methodology is the flow distribution to ensure equal flow rate and temperature to all parallel reaction channels (2). The second key is the reactor assembly and design that is suitable for industrial scale fabrication and manufacturing. <br/>A case study to demonstrate this reactor and methodology will be presented. First, the flow uniformity for segmented gas-liquid flow will be demonstrated in a hydrodynamic study. Two criteria for obtaining uniform segmented flow distribution in the system are found as a proper pressure balance in the system (i.e., a high ratio of pressure drop in the barrier channels to that in the reaction microchannel) and the avoidance of bubble coalescence. Second, the gas-liquid segmented flow distribution performance of the reactor is evaluated using fluid pairs with different liquid phase viscosity and surface tension properties. Third, the reactor is tested using a hydrogenation reaction as an industrially relevant model reaction. Finally, the scalability of this reactor design is demonstrated via combining two stacks of such multi-layer microreactors the liquid throughput of which is possible to reach about 1 ton per day.<br/>References<br/>1. Roberge M.D. “The complexity of technology implementation: flow versus batch processing”. Chimica Oggi-Chemistry Today. vol. 30(5) <br/>2. M. Al-Rawashdeh, F. Yu, T. A. Nijhuis, E. V. Rebrov, V. Hessel and J. C. Schouten. “Numbered-up gas-liquid micro/milli channels reactor with modular flow distributor”, Chem. Eng. J., 207-208, pp.645-655, 2012<br/><br/>

Topics
  • impedance spectroscopy
  • surface
  • viscosity
  • liquid phase