| People | Locations | Statistics |
|---|---|---|
| Naji, M. |
| |
| Motta, Antonella |
| |
| Aletan, Dirar |
| |
| Mohamed, Tarek |
| |
| Ertürk, Emre |
| |
| Taccardi, Nicola |
| |
| Kononenko, Denys |
| |
| Petrov, R. H. | Madrid |
|
| Alshaaer, Mazen | Brussels |
|
| Bih, L. |
| |
| Casati, R. |
| |
| Muller, Hermance |
| |
| Kočí, Jan | Prague |
|
| Šuljagić, Marija |
| |
| Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-Artemi | Brussels |
|
| Azam, Siraj |
| |
| Ospanova, Alyiya |
| |
| Blanpain, Bart |
| |
| Ali, M. A. |
| |
| Popa, V. |
| |
| Rančić, M. |
| |
| Ollier, Nadège |
| |
| Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro |
| |
| Landes, Michael |
| |
| Rignanese, Gian-Marco |
|
De Munck, Jan
in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%
Topics
Publications (28/28 displayed)
- 2017Biofilm-induced changes to the composite surfacecitations
- 2017Residual compressive surface stress increases the bending strength of dental zirconiacitations
- 2016Influence of Light Irradiation Through Zirconia on the Degree of Conversion of Composite Cementscitations
- 2016Short fibre-reinforced composite for extensive direct restorations: a laboratory and computational assessment
- 2016Bonding Effectiveness of Luting Composites to Different CAD/CAM Materialscitations
- 2015Aging resistance of surface-treated dental zirconiacitations
- 2015Bonding Effectiveness to Differently Sandblasted Dental Zirconiacitations
- 2014Influence of sintering conditions on low-temperature degradation of dental zirconiacitations
- 2013Fracture toughness versus micro-tensile bond strength testing of adhesive-dentin interfaces.citations
- 2011Bonding effectiveness of luting composites to zirconia ceramics
- 2010Surface Roughness of Two Composites After Etching with Various Acids
- 2007Microrotary fatigue resistance of a HEMA-free all-in-one adhesive bonded to dentin
- 2007Effects of ceramic surface treatments on the bond strength of an adhesive luting agent to CAD-CAM ceramic
- 2007Microrotary fatigue resistance of a HEMA-free all-in-one adhesive bonded to dentin.
- 2006NaOCl degradation of a HEMA-free all-in-one adhesive bonded to enamel and dentin following two air-blowing techniques.citations
- 2006Bond strength of a mild self-etch adhesive with and without prior acid-etching
- 2005Effect of fracture strength of primer-adhesive mixture on bonding effectiveness
- 2005A critical review of the durability of adhesion to tooth tissue: methods and results
- 2005Micro-rotary Fatigue Resistance of a HEMA-free One-step Adhesive
- 2005Micro-tensile bond strength of adhesives bonded to Class-I cavity-bottom dentin after thermo-cycling.citations
- 2005A critical review of the durability of adhesion to tooth tissue: methods and results.citations
- 2005Micro-tensile bond strength of adhesives bonded to class-I cavity-bottom dentin after thermo-cycling
- 2005Fatigue resistance of dentin/composite interfaces with an additional intermediate elastic layer
- 2005Fatigue resistance of dentin/composite interfaces with an additional intermediate elastic layer.citations
- 2004Fatigue resistance of dentin/composite interfaces with an additional shock-absorbing layer
- 2004Bonding of an auto-adhesive luting material to enamel and dentin.citations
- 2003Microtensile bond strengths of an etch&rinse and self-etch adhesive to enamel and dentin as a function of surface treatment
- 2002Micro-tensile bond strength of two adhesives to Erbium:YAG-lased vs. bur-cut enamel and dentin.citations
Places of action
| Organizations | Location | People |
|---|
article
Microrotary fatigue resistance of a HEMA-free all-in-one adhesive bonded to dentin.
Abstract
PURPOSE:To determine the effect of thorough air drying on the static and dynamic bonding effectiveness of a HEMA-free all-in-one adhesive bonded to Class-1 cavity-bottom dentin. MATERIALS AND METHODS:G-Bond (GC, Japan) was applied to standard occlusal Class I cavities following either a gentle (1 bar) or strong (4 bar) air-drying technique. After restoring the cavity using a composite resin (Gradia Anterior, GC), microspecimens were prepared that were loaded until failure or inserted in a microrotary fatigue testing device. RESULTS:Strong air drying had no effect on the static (39.1 vs. 38.4 MPa) or the dynamic (19.0 vs. 18.6 MPa) strength of the interface complex. CONCLUSION:Strong air drying did not improve the static or the dynamic bonding effectiveness, although a very thorough (4 bar) and long air-drying procedure was employed. SEM analysis revealed that even when the adhesive was strongly air dried, droplets originating from phase separations could still be observed, albeit to a reduced extent. Ineffective drying and pooling of the adhesive in a narrow cavity diminished the effect of strong air drying of the all-in-one adhesive.