| People | Locations | Statistics |
|---|---|---|
| Naji, M. |
| |
| Motta, Antonella |
| |
| Aletan, Dirar |
| |
| Mohamed, Tarek |
| |
| Ertürk, Emre |
| |
| Taccardi, Nicola |
| |
| Kononenko, Denys |
| |
| Petrov, R. H. | Madrid |
|
| Alshaaer, Mazen | Brussels |
|
| Bih, L. |
| |
| Casati, R. |
| |
| Muller, Hermance |
| |
| Kočí, Jan | Prague |
|
| Šuljagić, Marija |
| |
| Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-Artemi | Brussels |
|
| Azam, Siraj |
| |
| Ospanova, Alyiya |
| |
| Blanpain, Bart |
| |
| Ali, M. A. |
| |
| Popa, V. |
| |
| Rančić, M. |
| |
| Ollier, Nadège |
| |
| Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro |
| |
| Landes, Michael |
| |
| Rignanese, Gian-Marco |
|
Theofanous, Marios
University of Birmingham
in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%
Topics
Publications (24/24 displayed)
- 2023A triaxiality‐dependent fracture model for hot‐rolled sections made of S355 steel
- 2023Comparative study on fracture characteristics of carbon and stainless steel bolt materialcitations
- 2022Numerical modelling of stainless steel bolted T-stubs in tensioncitations
- 2022Numerical simulation and design of ferritic stainless steel bolted T-stubs in tensioncitations
- 2021Design of stainless steel cross-sections with outstand elements under stress gradientscitations
- 2021Structural response of cold-formed lipped Z purlins ��� Part 2 numerical modelling and optimisation of lip sizecitations
- 2021Structural response of cold-formed lipped Z purlins – Part 2 numerical modelling and optimisation of lip sizecitations
- 2021Experimental study of ferritic stainless steel bolted T-stubs under monotonic loadingcitations
- 2021Effect of transverse and longitudinal reinforcement ratios on the behaviour of RC T-beams shear-strengthened with embedded FRP barscitations
- 2019Elevated temperature performance of restrained stainless steel beamscitations
- 2019Structural behaviour of stainless steel beam-to-tubular column jointscitations
- 2019Plastic design of stainless steel continuous beamscitations
- 2019Numerical simulation and analysis of axially restrained stainless steel beams in fire
- 2019Effect of existing steel-to-embedded FRP shear reinforcement ratio on the behaviour of reinforced concrete T-beams
- 2018Behaviour of stainless steel beam-to-column joints-Part 2:citations
- 2018Experimental behavior and design of reinforced concrete exterior beam-column joints strengthened with embedded barscitations
- 2018Behaviour of stainless steel beam-to-column joints - Part 1: Experimental investigationcitations
- 2018Design of reinforced concrete T-beams strengthened in shear with externally bonded FRP composites
- 2017Material properties and compressive local buckling response of high strength steel square and rectangular hollow sectionscitations
- 2016The continuous strength method for steel cross-section design at elevated temperaturescitations
- 2016Laser-welded stainless steel I-sections: residual stress measurements and column buckling testscitations
- 2016Flexural behaviour of hot-finished high strength steel square and rectangular hollow sectionscitations
- 2015Experimental study of stainless steel angles and channels in bendingcitations
- 2012Ultimate capacity of stainless steel RHS subjected to combined compression and bending
Places of action
| Organizations | Location | People |
|---|
document
Effect of existing steel-to-embedded FRP shear reinforcement ratio on the behaviour of reinforced concrete T-beams
Abstract
<p>This paper examines the behaviour of reinforced concrete (RC) T-beams strengthened in shear withdeep embedment (DE) glass fibre reinforced polymer (GFRP) bars. Tests were conducted on a controlbeam as well as two DE GFRP-strengthened beams with existing steel-to-FRP shear reinforcementratios of 0.44 and 0.88. The shear strength enhancement decreased from 38.1% to 4.8% with theincrease in steel-to-FRP shear reinforcement ratio from 0.44 to 0.88. The strengthened beams had aslightly higher cracked stiffness due to the presence of the DE GFRP bars, which resisted inclined crackopening and consequently controlled deflection. The presence of DE GFRP bars resulted in a 58%reduction in the concrete contribution to shear resistance. The FRP contribution to shear resistancedecreased by 48% with the increase in steel-to-FRP shear reinforcement ratio. Comparison betweenexperimental results and TR55 predictions showed that TR55 significantly underestimate both thestrengthened shear force capacity and the FRP contribution to shear resistance.</p>