Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Damian, Markus

  • Google
  • 2
  • 4
  • 11

University of Bristol

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (2/2 displayed)

  • 2018From thought to action: Producing written languagecitations
  • 2015Why do some neurons in cortex respond to information in a selective manner? Insights from artificial neural networks11citations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Rapp, Brenda
1 / 1 shared
Bowers, Jeffrey
1 / 3 shared
Davis, Colin
1 / 1 shared
Vankov, Ivan
1 / 1 shared
Chart of publication period
2018
2015

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Rapp, Brenda
  • Bowers, Jeffrey
  • Davis, Colin
  • Vankov, Ivan
OrganizationsLocationPeople

booksection

From thought to action: Producing written language

  • Rapp, Brenda
  • Damian, Markus
Abstract

Written language is unlike other language components –phonological, syntactic, semantic, morphological processing-in several important ways.Written language (reading and spelling) is evolutionarily recent, a human invention that entered our repertoire only a few thousand years ago and has become widespread in the global population only in the past 100 years.As a result, unlike spoken language, written language has not had the opportunity to shape the human genome to provide a blueprint for its neural processing.Also, unlike other language skills, reading and spelling typically require explicit instruction –mere exposure during a sensitive period is usually not sufficient.Furthermore, written language acquisition in the individual follows spoken language acquisition and relies on it heavily.Nonetheless, in the literate adult, written language knowledge and processes become neurally and cognitively autonomous components of the language system, interacting in complex ways with the other language components to produce fluent spoken and written language production. Further, not only does spoken language knowledge influence orthographic processing (Bonin, Fayol & Chalard, 2001; Zhang & Damian 2010), but orthographic knowledge may also influence spoken language processing (Damian & Bowers, 2003; Seidenberg & Tanenhaus, 1979).It is hard to imagine a complete understanding of the psycholinguistics of language that does not include written language. Further, although reading has received considerable research attention and interest in psycholinguistics, written language production, unfortunately, has been the “neglected” language modality.This despite the fact that in this age of written electronic communication via email, texting, messaging, etc., increasing numbers of people are processing written language as much or more than spoken language and everywhere we are bombarded by people producing written language by typing into their phones.In this chapter, we review some of the central issues in the psycholinguistics of single word written language production with the goal of providing the reader with an understanding of the cognitive and neural bases of this important component of our language expertise.

Topics
  • impedance spectroscopy