Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Zhou, Jie

  • Google
  • 31
  • 66
  • 1772

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (31/31 displayed)

  • 2024Biodegradation-affected fatigue behavior of extrusion-based additively manufactured porous iron–manganese scaffolds5citations
  • 2023Biomechanical evaluation of additively manufactured patient-specific mandibular cage implants designed with a semi-automated workflow4citations
  • 2023Extrusion-based 3D printing of biodegradable, osteogenic, paramagnetic, and porous FeMn-akermanite bone substitutes25citations
  • 2023Quality of AM implants in biomedical application6citations
  • 2022Extrusion-based additive manufacturing of Mg-Zn alloy scaffolds29citations
  • 2022Additive manufacturing of bioactive and biodegradable porous iron-akermanite composites for bone regeneration39citations
  • 2022Poly(2-ethyl-2-oxazoline) coating of additively manufactured biodegradable porous iron14citations
  • 2022Additive Manufacturing of Biomaterials72citations
  • 2021Extrusion-based 3D printing of ex situ-alloyed highly biodegradable MRI-friendly porous iron-manganese scaffolds35citations
  • 2021Additively Manufactured Biodegradable Porous Zinc Implants for Orthopeadic Applicationscitations
  • 2021Extrusion-based 3D printed biodegradable porous iron79citations
  • 2021Biocompatibility and Absorption Behavior in Vitro of Direct Printed Porous Iron Porous Implantscitations
  • 2021Lattice structures made by laser powder bed fusion18citations
  • 2020Additively manufactured biodegradable porous zinc135citations
  • 2020Multi-material additive manufacturing technologies for Ti-, Mg-, and Fe-based biomaterials for bone substitution188citations
  • 2019Additively manufactured functionally graded biodegradable porous iron158citations
  • 2019Modeling high temperature deformation characteristics of AA7020 aluminum alloy using substructure-based constitutive equations and mesh-free approximation method17citations
  • 2019Biodegradation-affected fatigue behavior of additively manufactured porous magnesium109citations
  • 2018Additively manufactured biodegradable porous iron219citations
  • 2018A comprehensive investigation of the strengthening effects of dislocations, texture and low and high angle grain boundaries in ultrafine grained AA6063 aluminum alloy58citations
  • 2018Biodegradation and mechanical behavior of an advanced bioceramic-containing Mg matrix composite synthesized through in-situ solid-state oxidation9citations
  • 2017Advanced bredigite-containing magnesium-matrix composites for biodegradable bone implant applications50citations
  • 2017Improvement of mechanical properties of AA6063 aluminum alloy after equal channel angular pressing by applying a two-stage solution treatment39citations
  • 2017Additively manufactured biodegradable porous magnesium335citations
  • 2017Fabrication of novel magnesium-matrix composites and their mechanical properties prior to and during in vitro degradation32citations
  • 2016Simultaneous improvements of the strength and ductility of fine-grained AA6063 alloy with increasing number of ECAP passes70citations
  • 2016An investigation on the properties of injection-molded pure iron potentially for biodegradable stent application27citations
  • 2015Analysis of the densification behaviour of titanium/carbamide powder mixtures in the preparation of biomedical titanium scaffolds.citations
  • 2015In vitro degradation of magnesium metal matrix composites containing bredigitecitations
  • 2015Evolution of macro- and micro-pores in the porous structures of biomedical titanium scaffolds during isothermal sinteringcitations
  • 2010Preliminary investigation on creep-fatigue regime in extrusion diescitations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Moosabeiki, Vahid
2 / 3 shared
Zadpoor, Amir, A.
18 / 38 shared
Putra, Niko Eka
7 / 8 shared
Leeflang, Marius A.
1 / 1 shared
Wolvius, E. B.
1 / 3 shared
Jonker, B. P.
1 / 3 shared
Leeflang, M. A.
12 / 25 shared
Saldivar, M. Cruz
1 / 2 shared
Kootwijk, A. Van
1 / 1 shared
Tumer, Nazli
3 / 3 shared
Mirzaali, Mohammad, J.
5 / 24 shared
Mol, Arjan
13 / 64 shared
Dong, J.
2 / 12 shared
Klimopoulou, Maria
2 / 4 shared
Chang, J.
2 / 15 shared
Fratila-Apachitei, Lidy
6 / 11 shared
Taheri, Peyman
7 / 16 shared
Huan, Z.
1 / 6 shared
Shahriari, Nasim
1 / 1 shared
Díaz-Payno, Pedro J.
1 / 4 shared
Borg, K. G. N.
1 / 2 shared
Tigrine, A.
1 / 1 shared
Aksakal, S.
1 / 1 shared
Rosa, V. R. De La
1 / 1 shared
Rajaai, S. M.
1 / 1 shared
Jahr, Holger
5 / 6 shared
Lietaert, K.
4 / 9 shared
Pouran, B.
6 / 11 shared
Kubo, Yusuke
1 / 1 shared
Pavanram, P.
6 / 6 shared
Weinans, Harrie
6 / 12 shared
Fockaert, L. I.
3 / 5 shared
Minneboo, M.
1 / 3 shared
Yilmaz, A.
2 / 8 shared
Azarniya, Abolfazl
1 / 2 shared
Sovizi, Saeed
1 / 3 shared
Li, Wei
2 / 6 shared
San, H.
1 / 1 shared
Apachitei, Iulian
1 / 2 shared
Paggi, U.
1 / 1 shared
Zhang, X. Y.
2 / 3 shared
Bobbert, Françoise Siu Lin
1 / 2 shared
Eivani, A. R.
3 / 15 shared
Nikan, O.
1 / 1 shared
Vafaeenezhad, H.
1 / 3 shared
Tichelaar, F. D.
1 / 43 shared
Jahr, H.
2 / 2 shared
Gonzalez-Garcia, Yaiza
1 / 27 shared
Samaee, M.
2 / 2 shared
Najafi, S.
2 / 2 shared
Jafarian, H. R.
3 / 10 shared
Brouwer, J. C.
1 / 15 shared
Helm, F. C. T. Van Der
1 / 1 shared
Dezfuli, Sina Naddaf
4 / 4 shared
Huan, Zhiguang
2 / 2 shared
Leeflang, Sander
5 / 5 shared
Chang, Jiang
1 / 2 shared
Ashrafizadeh, S. M.
1 / 2 shared
Schröder, K. U.
1 / 1 shared
Mariot, P.
1 / 1 shared
Leeflang, Ma
1 / 1 shared
Schaeffer, L.
1 / 1 shared
Arifvianto, Budi
2 / 2 shared
Tomesani, Luca
1 / 20 shared
Donati, Lorenzo
1 / 27 shared
Reggiani, Barbara
1 / 23 shared
Chart of publication period
2024
2023
2022
2021
2020
2019
2018
2017
2016
2015
2010

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Moosabeiki, Vahid
  • Zadpoor, Amir, A.
  • Putra, Niko Eka
  • Leeflang, Marius A.
  • Wolvius, E. B.
  • Jonker, B. P.
  • Leeflang, M. A.
  • Saldivar, M. Cruz
  • Kootwijk, A. Van
  • Tumer, Nazli
  • Mirzaali, Mohammad, J.
  • Mol, Arjan
  • Dong, J.
  • Klimopoulou, Maria
  • Chang, J.
  • Fratila-Apachitei, Lidy
  • Taheri, Peyman
  • Huan, Z.
  • Shahriari, Nasim
  • Díaz-Payno, Pedro J.
  • Borg, K. G. N.
  • Tigrine, A.
  • Aksakal, S.
  • Rosa, V. R. De La
  • Rajaai, S. M.
  • Jahr, Holger
  • Lietaert, K.
  • Pouran, B.
  • Kubo, Yusuke
  • Pavanram, P.
  • Weinans, Harrie
  • Fockaert, L. I.
  • Minneboo, M.
  • Yilmaz, A.
  • Azarniya, Abolfazl
  • Sovizi, Saeed
  • Li, Wei
  • San, H.
  • Apachitei, Iulian
  • Paggi, U.
  • Zhang, X. Y.
  • Bobbert, Françoise Siu Lin
  • Eivani, A. R.
  • Nikan, O.
  • Vafaeenezhad, H.
  • Tichelaar, F. D.
  • Jahr, H.
  • Gonzalez-Garcia, Yaiza
  • Samaee, M.
  • Najafi, S.
  • Jafarian, H. R.
  • Brouwer, J. C.
  • Helm, F. C. T. Van Der
  • Dezfuli, Sina Naddaf
  • Huan, Zhiguang
  • Leeflang, Sander
  • Chang, Jiang
  • Ashrafizadeh, S. M.
  • Schröder, K. U.
  • Mariot, P.
  • Leeflang, Ma
  • Schaeffer, L.
  • Arifvianto, Budi
  • Tomesani, Luca
  • Donati, Lorenzo
  • Reggiani, Barbara
OrganizationsLocationPeople

document

Analysis of the densification behaviour of titanium/carbamide powder mixtures in the preparation of biomedical titanium scaffolds.

  • Zhou, Jie
  • Arifvianto, Budi
  • Leeflang, Sander
Abstract

Tissue engineering is a promising approach to the reconstruction of critical size bone defects. In this approach, a porous material, namely a scaffold, is devised as a template to support and guide the formation of new bone cells and the regeneration of bone tissue in the damaged site. Titanium is considered a preferred biomedical material for bone tissue engineering scaffolds. Among a number of techniques that have so far been developed to produce porous-structured titanium, the space holder method has been recognized as a viable one owing to its ability to produce porous scaffolds with desired structural characteristics. In this technique, space holding particles are utilized as a pore former. The fabrication process for titanium scaffolds is composed of a series of processing steps, i.e., (i) mixing of a titanium matrix powder with space holding particles, (ii) compaction of the powder mixture to form a composite compact, (iii) removal of space holding particles from the composite compact and (iv) sintering of the porous titanium matrix. Despite initial success in applying this technique, a number of technological challenges are still present, such as the difficulties in controlling the geometry changes of space holding particles during the compaction process. Obviously, compacting pressure must be optimized in order to prevent space holding particles from distortion, so as to ensure pore sizes and shape as desired for the scaffold product. In addition, the correlations between compaction process parameters and porous structure characteristics must be established to facilitate through-process modeling along the whole chain of the fabrication of bone tissue engineering scaffolds in the near future. In the present research, the behavior of titanium/carbamide powder mixtures during cold compaction was characterized and optimum compacting pressures for the fabrication of titanium scaffolds using the space holder method were derived. In addition, the Heckel equation describing the densification of powder mixtures during compaction was applied to assess its validity in the case of the present powder mixtures composed of two mechanically dissimilar components. A titanium powder with spherical particles and a carbamide powder with cubical particles were used as the matrix and pore former, respectively. Titanium/carbamide powder mixtures were prepared by mixing the powders for 3 h. Granular materials were then compacted with an instrumented powder compaction press. The variation of the load during compaction with the punch displacement was registered. The load-displacement plots were analyzed using the Heckel model for powder compaction and the rule of mixtures. The results showed varied compaction behavior of titanium and carbamide powders as their relative volume fractions changed. Titanium/carbamide powder mixtures exhibited intermediate behaviors of the component powders during compaction. The initial density of the compact was found to be of critical importance, as it determined the at-pressure density of the powder mixture compact. A lower compacting pressures was required for the compaction of a powder mixture with a larger volume fraction of carbamide. In addition, the experimental data could be well fitted into the Heckel equation. Although refining is still needed, the model can be used as a guide for the selection of an optimum compacting pressure in the preparation of titanium scaffolds with the space holder method.

Topics
  • porous
  • density
  • impedance spectroscopy
  • pore
  • composite
  • titanium
  • sintering
  • densification
  • titanium powder