Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Bousias, Stathis N.

  • Google
  • 1
  • 4
  • 0

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (1/1 displayed)

  • 2004Fiber-reinforced polymer retrofitting of rectangular reinforced concrete columns with or without corrosioncitations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Oregan, Bill A.
1 / 1 shared
Fardis, Michael N.
1 / 1 shared
Spathis, Loukas
1 / 1 shared
Triantafillou, Thanasis
1 / 39 shared
Chart of publication period
2004

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Oregan, Bill A.
  • Fardis, Michael N.
  • Spathis, Loukas
  • Triantafillou, Thanasis
OrganizationsLocationPeople

article

Fiber-reinforced polymer retrofitting of rectangular reinforced concrete columns with or without corrosion

  • Oregan, Bill A.
  • Fardis, Michael N.
  • Spathis, Loukas
  • Triantafillou, Thanasis
  • Bousias, Stathis N.
Abstract

<p>Twenty concrete columns, with a 250 × 500 mm section and materials and detailing emulating older construction, are tested to investigate, in a systematic way, the effect of important parameters of seismic retrofit with fiber-reinforced polymer (FRP) wraps, as well as the effect of reinforcing bar corrosion on the effectiveness of the retrofitting. As far as the number of FRP layers and the fiber material is concerned, it is concluded that replacing carbon fibers by glass fibers, while maintaining the same extensional stiffness of the FRP jacket in the circumferential direction, leads to about the same performance. Nonetheless, FRP extensional stiffness seems to be the controlling factor up to a certain limit, as increasing the number of carbon fiber-reinforced polymer (CFRP) layers from two to five does not materially improve performance. Previous damage left unrepaired reduces the effectiveness of rehabilitation with FRP wraps. Confinement by the FRP is very effective in increasing concrete strain capacity to levels of 5 to 6% even in the middle of a wide side of the column. Nonetheless, rectangular columns tested in the strong direction (with a 250 mm-wide compression zone) are found to benefit more from FRP wrapping than when tested in their weak direction (with a 500 mm-wide compression zone). Although wrapping with FRP is found to significantly improve seismic performance of columns that suffer from both lack of seismic detailing and of corrosion of the reinforcement, such corrosion materially reduces the effectiveness of FRP wraps as a strengthening measure, as the corroded bars become the weak link of the column, instead of the confined compression zone.</p>

Topics
  • impedance spectroscopy
  • polymer
  • Carbon
  • corrosion
  • glass
  • glass