Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Adam, Clayton

  • Google
  • 13
  • 15
  • 31

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (13/13 displayed)

  • 2020The effect of vertebral body stapling on spine biomechanics and structure using a bovine model3citations
  • 2014Gravity-induced coronal plane joint moments in the adolescent scoliotic spinecitations
  • 2014Segmental torso masses in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis8citations
  • 2014The effect of repeated loading and freeze - thaw cycling on immature bovine thoracic motion segment stiffness8citations
  • 2014The effect of intervertebral staple insertion on bovine spine segment stiffnesscitations
  • 2014Intervertebral staple grading system with micro-CTcitations
  • 2013Segmental torso masses and gravity-induced coronal plane joint moments in adolescent idiopathic scoliosiscitations
  • 2013The effect of testing protocol on immature bovine thoracic spine segment stiffnesscitations
  • 2013Segmental torso masses and coronal plane joint torques in the adolescent scoliotic spinecitations
  • 2010Fusionless scoliosis correction using shape memory alloy staplescitations
  • 2009Development of a biaxial compression device for biological samples: preliminary experimental results for a closed cell foam4citations
  • 2006Development of a method to validate computer models of the spine for scoliosis correction surgery simulationcitations
  • 2002Finite element analysis of high strain rate superplastic forming (SPF) of Al–Ti alloys8citations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Labrom, Robert D.
5 / 6 shared
Askin, Geoffrey
9 / 10 shared
Sunni, Nabeel
5 / 5 shared
Askin, Geoffrey N.
1 / 1 shared
Pettet, Graeme J.
1 / 1 shared
Keenan, Bethany E.
1 / 2 shared
Pettet, Graeme
3 / 3 shared
Labrom, Robert
5 / 5 shared
Keenan, Bethany
3 / 5 shared
Verzin, Eugene J.
1 / 1 shared
Evans, John
1 / 2 shared
Tevelen, Greg
1 / 1 shared
Cunningham, Helen
1 / 1 shared
Yarlagadda, Prasad Kdv
1 / 50 shared
Gudimetla, Prasad V.
1 / 1 shared
Chart of publication period
2020
2014
2013
2010
2009
2006
2002

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Labrom, Robert D.
  • Askin, Geoffrey
  • Sunni, Nabeel
  • Askin, Geoffrey N.
  • Pettet, Graeme J.
  • Keenan, Bethany E.
  • Pettet, Graeme
  • Labrom, Robert
  • Keenan, Bethany
  • Verzin, Eugene J.
  • Evans, John
  • Tevelen, Greg
  • Cunningham, Helen
  • Yarlagadda, Prasad Kdv
  • Gudimetla, Prasad V.
OrganizationsLocationPeople

document

The effect of intervertebral staple insertion on bovine spine segment stiffness

  • Labrom, Robert D.
  • Adam, Clayton
  • Askin, Geoffrey
  • Sunni, Nabeel
Abstract

IntroductionThere is growing interest in the biomechanics of ‘fusionless’ implant constructs used for deformity correction in the thoracic spine. Intervertebral stapling is a leading method of fusionless corrective surgery. Although used for a number of years, there is limited evidence as to the effect these staples have on the stiffness of the functional spinal unit.Materials and MethodsThoracic spines from 6-8 week old calves were dissected and divided into motion segments including levels T4-T11 (n=14). Each segment was potted in polymethylemethacrylate. An Instron Biaxial materials testing machine with a custom made jig was used for testing. The segments were tested in flexion/extension, lateral bending and axial rotation at 37⁰C and 100% humidity, using moment control to a maximum 1.75 Nm with a loading rate of 0.3 Nm per second. This torque was found sufficient to achieve physiologically representative ranges of movement. The segments were initially tested uninstrumented with data collected from the tenth load cycle. Next a left anterolateral Shape Memory Alloy (SMA) staple was inserted (Medtronic Sofamor Danek, USA). Biomechanical testing was repeated as before with data collected from the tenth load cycle.ResultsIn flexion/extension there was an insignificant drop in stiffness of 3% (p=0.478). In lateral bending there was a significant drop in stiffness of 21% (p<0.001). This was mainly in lateral bending away from the staple, where the stiffness reduced by 30% (p<0.001). This was in contrast to lateral bending towards the staple where it dropped by 12% which was still statistically significant (p=0.036). In axial rotation there was an overall near significant drop in stiffness of 11% (p=0.076). However, this was more towards the side of the staple measuring a decrease of 14% as opposed to 8% away from the staple. In both cases it was a statistically insignificant drop (p=0.134 and p=0.352 respectively).ConclusionInsertion of intervertebral SMA staples results in a significant reduction in motion segment stiffness in lateral bending especially in the direction away from the staple. The staple had less effect on axial rotation stiffness and minimal effect on flexion/extension stiffness.

Topics
  • impedance spectroscopy
  • laser emission spectroscopy