Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Cunningham, Helen

  • Google
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (1/1 displayed)

  • 2006Development of a method to validate computer models of the spine for scoliosis correction surgery simulationcitations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Adam, Clayton
1 / 13 shared
Chart of publication period
2006

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Adam, Clayton
OrganizationsLocationPeople

document

Development of a method to validate computer models of the spine for scoliosis correction surgery simulation

  • Cunningham, Helen
  • Adam, Clayton
Abstract

DEVELOPMENT OF A METHOD TO VALIDATE COMPUTER MODELS OF THE SPINE FOR SCOLIOSIS CORRECTION SURGERY SIMULATIONHelen Cunningham, Clayton J Adam, Mark J PearcySchool of Engineering Systems, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, AustraliaIntroductionEndoscopic single rod anterior fusion surgery for the treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) offers the advantages of improved cosmetic results, the fusion of fewer segments and faster patient rehabilitation.The development of a patient-specific finite element model of the spine to be used to predict post-operative biomechanical outcomes of anterior AIS surgery will improve the pre-operative planning and performance of scoliosis instrumentation.This study aims to develop a methodology for validating the finite element modelling approach to scoliosis surgical planning by producing biomechanical data for movements of ovine lumbar spines both with and without anterior rod scoliosis instrumentation.MethodsOvine lumbar spine specimens were CT scanned, dissected and instrumented across four levels (L2-L5) with a generic anterior single rod and screw implant for scoliosis correction.A displacement controlled 6 degree-of-freedom robotic facility was used to perform biomechanical testing on the spine segments for rotations of ±4 degrees in flexion/extension and lateral bending, and ±3 degrees in axial rotation.The tests were repeated with the rod removed.Resistive force and moment data was recorded using a force transducer and strain gauges on the surface of the rod yielded torsion and bending moment strain data, recorded on a data logger.All data was synchronised with the robot position data and filtered using moving average methods.The stiffness of the spines for each movement was calculated in units of Nm/degree of rotation.ResultsAs expected the results reflect the variability found in biological materials.The similarities of behaviour profiles however, support the use of this method for FE model validation.The addition of the rod caused an increase in stiffness for each movement.This increase was 17±7% and 23±10% for left and right axial rotation, 93±35% and 73±50% for left and right lateral bending, and 78±46% and 67±35% for flexion and extension respectively.Recorded strains on the rod surface did not exceed 400με.DiscussionThe outcomes of this study have provided an experimental method for validating behaviour predicted by finite element models of the spine fitted with anterior scoliosis instrumentation.Using the CT scans of the ovine spines along with documentation of the experimental positioning of the specimens, the testing conditions can be simulated in a finite element model and the experimental and predicted biomechanical outcomes compared.The study also offers comparative information about the relative stiffness of the spine with and without scoliosis instrumentation.

Topics
  • surface
  • simulation
  • biological material
  • computed tomography scan