Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Gudimetla, Prasad

  • Google
  • 2
  • 2
  • 0

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (2/2 displayed)

  • 2009Simulation of delaminations in composite laminatescitations
  • 2007Finite Element Analysis of the Interaction between an AWJ Particle and a Polycrystalline Alumina Ceramiccitations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Kharidi, Aprameya
1 / 1 shared
Yarlagadda, Prasad Kdv
2 / 50 shared
Chart of publication period
2009
2007

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Kharidi, Aprameya
  • Yarlagadda, Prasad Kdv
OrganizationsLocationPeople

article

Finite Element Analysis of the Interaction between an AWJ Particle and a Polycrystalline Alumina Ceramic

  • Yarlagadda, Prasad Kdv
  • Gudimetla, Prasad
Abstract

Purpose: Abrasive waterjet cutting involves use of a high pressure, abrasive laden waterjet at trans-sonic speeds to cut difficult-to-machine materials. The jet-material interaction depends on the nature of the material being cut, such as ductile or brittle. The brittle regime involves the generation and propagation of microcracks due to impact and many theories have been proposed in this regard. We aim to resolve the nature of the generation and propagation of cracks in such phenomena using the finite element analysis methodology.Design/methodology/approach: A 3-dimensional FE model was set up using PATRAN. The alumina ceramic was modelled as a 1-mm cube while a 0.1mm diameter half sphere was used to model a single abrasive particle. The system was imported into ABAQUS and an explicit analysis was performed. The element deletion method was used after invoking a failure criterion to estimate the number of elements removed due to a single impact. The aggregate volume of eroded material was then calculated by multiplying the number of elements removed with the volume of each element. The results of the FEA were compared with the brittle model proposedby Kim & Zeng [12].Findings: The results of the FEA indicate that mixed-mode failure is the most common form of failure in such interactions. The volume of material removed per impact from the FE results is close to 16% of those predicted by Kim & Zeng’s model.Research limitations/implications: The finite element framework presented is idealized for the case of regular cubes based on a set of assumptions.Originality/value: This finite element approach is a good tool to study the nature of interaction between a microscopic particle and a brittle material and accurately predict the erosion mechanisms in such interactions.

Topics
  • impedance spectroscopy
  • crack
  • ceramic
  • finite element analysis