People | Locations | Statistics |
---|---|---|
Naji, M. |
| |
Motta, Antonella |
| |
Aletan, Dirar |
| |
Mohamed, Tarek |
| |
Ertürk, Emre |
| |
Taccardi, Nicola |
| |
Kononenko, Denys |
| |
Petrov, R. H. | Madrid |
|
Alshaaer, Mazen | Brussels |
|
Bih, L. |
| |
Casati, R. |
| |
Muller, Hermance |
| |
Kočí, Jan | Prague |
|
Šuljagić, Marija |
| |
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-Artemi | Brussels |
|
Azam, Siraj |
| |
Ospanova, Alyiya |
| |
Blanpain, Bart |
| |
Ali, M. A. |
| |
Popa, V. |
| |
Rančić, M. |
| |
Ollier, Nadège |
| |
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro |
| |
Landes, Michael |
| |
Rignanese, Gian-Marco |
|
Mills, Douglas J.
University of Northampton
in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%
Topics
Publications (15/15 displayed)
- 2017Advances in corrosion protection by organic coatings: what we know and what we would like to knowcitations
- 2016The application of organic coatings in conservation of archaeological objects excavated from the seacitations
- 2016Analysis of electrochemical noise measurement on an organically coated metalcitations
- 2014Steel surface preparation prior to painting and its impact on protective performance of organic coatingcitations
- 2014Effect of hardener variation on protective properties of polyurethane coatingcitations
- 2012Investigation into the effect of nano-silica on the protective properties of polyurethane coatingscitations
- 2011Investigation of morphological and electrical properties of the PMMA coating upon exposure to UV irradiation based on AFM studiescitations
- 2010Effect of different surface preparations prior to painting on the corrosion behaviour and surface activity of mild steel
- 2010The influence of UV light on performance of poly(methyl methacrylate) in regard to dye-sensitised solar cellscitations
- 2010Use of electrochemical methods to examine different surface preparation methods for organic coatings on steelcitations
- 2010Electrochemical characterization of mild steel after different surface preparations
- 2008Using novel electrochemical test methods to aid in the development of low volatile organic compound (VOC) coatings
- 2008Continuing work to enable electrochemical methods to be used to monitor the performance of organic coatings in the fieldcitations
- 2007MPs and lords learn something about corrosion!
- 2001A comparison between conventional macroscopic and microscopic scanning electrochemical methods to evaluate galvanic corrosioncitations
Places of action
Organizations | Location | People |
---|
document
Electrochemical characterization of mild steel after different surface preparations
Abstract
Chemical and mechanical surface preparation methods have been commonly used to remove impurities and oxide layers from the steel surface prior to painting and enhance the protection afforded by coating. The level of adhesion between the coating and substrate is a key factor in maintaining protection. Mechanical interlocking of polymeric structure into the metal surface and electrostatic bonds between coating and substrate are two of the mechanisms involved. The surface structure resulting from each surface preparation method gives different geometry and electrochemical properties to the surface. Recent studies (by Chen et al [1]) have shown that the geometry and depth of surface irregularities of steel play an important role in pit forming and the localized corrosion. Also previous work in our laboratory [2] showed that the type of surface preparation of the steel prior to coating had a dramatic effect on the subsequent corrosion protection afforded in immersion tests and in salt spray testing. In the present work 5 different surface preparation methods (abrasive blasting, water-jetting, abrasion, acid pickling and degreasing) have been applied on the mild steel surface. The electrochemical activity of the resulting surface in the dilute saline water has been characterised using scanning vibrating electrode technique (SVET) to locally detect anodic and cathodic sites on the surface. Scanning electron microscope together with energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy has been used to characterise the surface structure and its chemical composition. Also the general corrosion behaviour and the overall susceptibility to localised corrosion have been studied using electrochemical noise measurement. Results have shown significant variability between the different surface preparations. Some explanations for these differences will be advanced.