Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Al, Resul

  • Google
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4

Technical University of Denmark

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (2/2 displayed)

  • 2022DeepGSA: Plant Data-Driven Global Sensitivity Analysis using Deep Learning4citations
  • 2019A Simulation-Based Superstructure Optimization Approach for Process Synthesis and Design Under Uncertaintycitations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Sin, Gürkan
2 / 9 shared
Aouichaoui, Adem Rosenkvist Nielsen
1 / 1 shared
Gernaey, Krist V.
1 / 12 shared
Chart of publication period
2022
2019

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Sin, Gürkan
  • Aouichaoui, Adem Rosenkvist Nielsen
  • Gernaey, Krist V.
OrganizationsLocationPeople

document

A Simulation-Based Superstructure Optimization Approach for Process Synthesis and Design Under Uncertainty

  • Gernaey, Krist V.
  • Al, Resul
  • Sin, Gürkan
Abstract

Systematic frameworks to chemical and biochemical process design have been traditionally focused on mathematical programming-based approaches in which a deterministicsuperstructure optimization problem is formulated and solved using mixed integer nonlinear solvers (MINLP) to find an optimal design of a processing network. Although significant progress has been achieved in development of these MINLP solvers, wider application of these approaches is hindered by 2 major limitations: (1) the strict requirement of algebraic (mathematically trackable) modeling of the underlying processes, (2) the lack of consideration concerning the effects of uncertainties on the solution returned by deterministic optimization solvers. Therefore, there has been a significant interest in approaches bringing together the power of well-established understanding of process simulation technologies into the optimization-based process design frameworks which can also systematically integrate the available uncertainty information during its optimal design selection steps.<br/>In recent years, simulation-based optimization emerged as a promising alternative to traditional mathematical optimization as it allows for detailed optimization of processes solely by making use of the input-output data of arbitrarily complex process simulations, without needing to make any optimization inference from the internal model structure (such as information of derivatives, etc.). In this work, we present a novel framework for process synthesis and design by combining the power of rigorous process simulation, advanced machine learning algorithms for optimization, and Monte Carlo simulations for design under uncertainty. The framework is implemented into a decision support tool, sustainable process synthesis and design (SPDLab), which uses an in-house Stochastic Kriging-based optimization solver to direct the search for the optimal design. The capabilities of the tool are demonstrated with a case study of selecting an optimal process design for an industrially-relevant scale wastewater treatment plant (WWTP) based on techno-economic performance metrics (effluent quality index (EQI) and operational cost index (OCI)), in which significant design variables are identified with a computationally efficient global sensitivity analysis using Gaussian process modeling with the Sobol sensitivity method. Furthermore, the effects of system uncertainties, such as variations in influent wastewater pollutant load and composition, cost of electricity used for aeration, and the price of biogas produced in sludge digesters, are incorporated into the stochastic estimation of the objective and technical performance constraint values (i.e. regulated effluent discharge limits) via a Monte Carlo simulations framework. Results obtained highlight the importance of considering the uncertainties at the early stage of design and show that the tool can provide significant insights into engineering design decision-making processes by incorporating all the available process understanding with the state-of-the-art process systems engineering methodologies.

Topics
  • impedance spectroscopy
  • simulation
  • machine learning