Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Efthymiou, Mike

  • Google
  • 3
  • 3
  • 30

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (3/3 displayed)

  • 2022An efficient probabilistic framework for the long-term fatigue assessment of large diameter steel risers11citations
  • 2021A Bayesian machine learning approach to rapidly quantifying the fatigue probability of failure for steel catenary risers19citations
  • 2018An ANN-based framework for rapid spectral fatigue analysis of steel catenary riserscitations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Randolph, Mark
3 / 10 shared
Grime, Andrew
3 / 4 shared
Hejazi, Rasoul
3 / 4 shared
Chart of publication period
2022
2021
2018

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Randolph, Mark
  • Grime, Andrew
  • Hejazi, Rasoul
OrganizationsLocationPeople

document

An ANN-based framework for rapid spectral fatigue analysis of steel catenary risers

  • Efthymiou, Mike
  • Randolph, Mark
  • Grime, Andrew
  • Hejazi, Rasoul
Abstract

<p>A simplified framework is presented in which an existing artificial neural network (ANN) based tool for critical stress range prediction is used in order to rapidly assess the fatigue life of a steel catenary riser (SCR). The simplified approach considers the first-order motions of the hosting floater (heave, pitch and roll motions) and irregular sea-states to assess the critical stress range within the touchdown zone (TDZ) of the SCR. Stress transfer functions are generated that approximate the SCR TDZ critical stress range due to vertical motion at the SCR hang-off point. The motion response amplitude operators (RAOs) and transfer functions are then combined to generate the SCR TDZ stress spectra and hence assess accumulated fatigue damage for all potential sea-states at the floater location. The fatigue lives of two large diameter SCRs subject to a sample irregular wave scatter diagram are calculated using the simplified framework. The results are then compared with those determined via a state of the art commercial software that uses a dynamic time-domain finite element (FE) analysis with rain-flow cycle (RFC) counting and shown to provide a good agreement. It is an important result as the time required to run the simplified analysis is an order of magnitude smaller than the more rigorous analysis (minutes versus hours). It demonstrates the usefulness of the simplified approach at the early stages of an SCR design where a large number of simulations are needed for sensitivity studies in order to select an optimized concept.</p>

Topics
  • impedance spectroscopy
  • simulation
  • steel
  • fatigue