Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Ozoliņš, Oļǵerts

  • Google
  • 1
  • 4
  • 0

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (1/1 displayed)

  • 2014Verification study on buckling behaviour of composite cylinder with eccentric supportscitations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Arbelo, Mariano A.
1 / 9 shared
Castro, Saullo G. P.
1 / 27 shared
Kalnins, Kaspars
1 / 6 shared
Degenhardt, Richard
1 / 8 shared
Chart of publication period
2014

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Arbelo, Mariano A.
  • Castro, Saullo G. P.
  • Kalnins, Kaspars
  • Degenhardt, Richard
OrganizationsLocationPeople

document

Verification study on buckling behaviour of composite cylinder with eccentric supports

  • Arbelo, Mariano A.
  • Castro, Saullo G. P.
  • Kalnins, Kaspars
  • Ozoliņš, Oļǵerts
  • Degenhardt, Richard
Abstract

<p>Imperfection sensitive structures such as unstiffened or skin-dominant shell structures are commonly used for aeronautic and aerospace applications. Cylindrical shells are dominating satellite launcher structures and a reliable methodology to calculate their behaviour in the early stages of design is fundamental to achieve optimum results. Launcher design requires fast and precise prediction of structural weight as well its weight distribution already in the early design phase, because in that phase different concepts of the whole launcher system have to be evaluated in order to identify the optimal one. The prediction has to be precise, because less reliable ones might lead to basic changes, later in the detailed design phase, which might also influence the design of the whole system. Such changes in later design phases are extremely costly in terms of time and money; they definitely have to be avoided. The dimensioning criterion with the design of launcher structures is buckling not before ultimate load, thus they do not have an exploitable post-buckling area. The most critical aspect for numerical buckling prediction is the structure's sensitivity to geometric and loading imperfections. Currently, imperfection sensitive shell structures prone to buckling are designed according to the NASA SP-8007 guideline [1], from 1968, using its conservative lower bound curve. In this guideline the structural behaviour of composite materials is not appropriately considered, since the imperfection sensitivity and the buckling load of shells made of such materials depend on the lay-up design. There is no specific design guideline for imperfection sensitive composite structures prone to buckling. NASA performed high investments for the last 5 years with one project called "Shell Buckling Knock-down Factor" (SBKF) in order to develop a new guideline to calculate the knock-down factor of cylindrical shells prone to buckling [2], and also the European project DESICOS [3] (New Robust DESign Guideline for Imperfection Sensitive Composite Launcher Structures) is working on new methodologies to estimate the ultimate load of such structures. An example of applicability of these new design guidelines could be the next generation of the European launchers family "Ariane" in order to maintain the actual position in the satellite launchers market [4].</p>

Topics
  • impedance spectroscopy
  • phase
  • laser emission spectroscopy
  • composite