Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Steffensen, Karina Dahl

  • Google
  • 3
  • 7
  • 62

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (3/3 displayed)

  • 2019Development of a decision aid to support ovarian cancer patient decide on CA125 biomarker monitoringcitations
  • 2017Biomarker CA125citations
  • 2007Prediction of response to chemotherapy by ERCC1 immunohistochemistry and ERCC1 polymorphism in ovarian cancer62citations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Jensen, Pernille Tine
2 / 2 shared
Kargo, Anette
2 / 2 shared
Coulter, Angela
2 / 2 shared
Jakobsen, Anders
1 / 2 shared
Brandslund, Ivan
1 / 2 shared
Jeppesen, Ulla
1 / 1 shared
Waldstrøm, M.
1 / 1 shared
Chart of publication period
2019
2017
2007

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Jensen, Pernille Tine
  • Kargo, Anette
  • Coulter, Angela
  • Jakobsen, Anders
  • Brandslund, Ivan
  • Jeppesen, Ulla
  • Waldstrøm, M.
OrganizationsLocationPeople

document

Development of a decision aid to support ovarian cancer patient decide on CA125 biomarker monitoring

  • Steffensen, Karina Dahl
  • Jensen, Pernille Tine
  • Kargo, Anette
  • Coulter, Angela
Abstract

Introduction<br/>Each year in Denmark 450 women are diagnosed with ovarian cancer (OC). The majorities are diagnosed with advanced disease, and 70-80% will experience relapse with only limited curative potential. Evidence has shown that early initiation of recurrence treatment based alone on rising CA125 alone does not improve survival. Monitoring CA125 is a validated method for detecting relapse, and increasing CA125 can be detected months before symptoms appears and recurrence is visible on imaging. Danish Health Authorities recommend that personal preferences should be taken into account prior to initiating CA125 monitoring through the use of a patient decision aid (ptDA). <br/>Aim:<br/>To develop and validate a ptDA on a preference sensitive decision on CA125 monitoring during follow-up. <br/>Methods<br/>In close collaboration with clinicians, designers, patients, and the Danish Cancer Society a draft ptDA was created. The ptDA was discussed with a focus group of 7 former OC patients and the ptDA was modified following their input. Subsequently, the ptDA was alpha tested, using a structured interview guide. The third ptDA development step is beta testing on real time patients including Decision Conflict Scale (DCS) before and after patients have been represented for the ptDA. <br/>Results <br/>Preliminary data from the first 9 patients included in the beta test showed a decline in all DCS subscores and in total DCS score after patients have been presented for the in-consult ptDA.The total DCS score declined from 22.9 before the consultation to 13.0 after the consultation (p = 0.340). The uncertainty subscore declined from 18.5 to 5.6 (p = 0.055) and the informed subscore declined from 26.9 to 9.3 (p = 0.103). Moreover, the clarity and support subscores also decreased; from 28.8 to 17.6 (p = 0.391) and from 18.5 to 4.6 (p = 0.438) respectively.<br/>Conclusion <br/>None of the DCS scores decreased significantly, probably due to the yet low number of recruited patients. Though, the preliminary data from the beta test showed that the ptDA was helpful and the data indicate that the use of a ptDA leads to a better informed decision and that the ptDA supports the decision making process.<br/>

Topics
  • impedance spectroscopy