Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Larranaga-Vega, Ane

  • Google
  • 1
  • 5
  • 0

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (1/1 displayed)

  • 2019Comparative in vitro study of 3D robocasting scaffolds using beta tricalcium phosphate and synthetic bone mineralcitations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Mijares, Dindo
1 / 3 shared
Witek, Lukasz
1 / 42 shared
Cronstein, Bruce N.
1 / 12 shared
Coelho, Paulo G.
1 / 36 shared
Rivera, Cristobal
1 / 2 shared
Chart of publication period
2019

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Mijares, Dindo
  • Witek, Lukasz
  • Cronstein, Bruce N.
  • Coelho, Paulo G.
  • Rivera, Cristobal
OrganizationsLocationPeople

document

Comparative in vitro study of 3D robocasting scaffolds using beta tricalcium phosphate and synthetic bone mineral

  • Mijares, Dindo
  • Witek, Lukasz
  • Cronstein, Bruce N.
  • Coelho, Paulo G.
  • Larranaga-Vega, Ane
  • Rivera, Cristobal
Abstract

<p>Introduction: Bone defects may occur due to various congenital disorders, traumas, tumors, or oncological resections. As a treatment option, bioactive ceramic-based graft materials have been used to regenerate bone<sup>1</sup>. One example of a bioceramic material used to regenerate bone is Synthetic Bone Mineral (SBM), which is described as a carbonate hydroxyapatite with ionic substitutions such as F<sup>-</sup>, Zn<sup>2+</sup> and Mg<sup>2+</sup>. A novel formulation of SBM has been studied, showing successful results; improving bone density and promoting bone formation<sup>2</sup>. SBM colloidal gel has been fabricated for robocasting applications<sup>3</sup>. A robocasting 3D printer is used to customize ceramic structures for building scaffolds for bone regeneration<sup>4</sup>. The objective of this work is to compare the in vitro performance of printed 3D scaffolds made from two different bioceramic materials, β-tricalcium phosphate (β-TCP) and SBM.</p>

Topics
  • density
  • impedance spectroscopy
  • mineral
  • defect
  • ceramic