Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Pani, Martino

  • Google
  • 2
  • 7
  • 8

University of Portsmouth

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (2/2 displayed)

  • 20174D printing biomimetic tissue structures using correlative approachescitations
  • 2016Morphological and mechanical biomimetic bone structures8citations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Parwani, Rachna Narendra
1 / 1 shared
Curto, Marco
2 / 2 shared
Tozzi, Gianluca
2 / 13 shared
Barber, Asa
2 / 7 shared
Kao, Alex
1 / 1 shared
Parwani, Rachna
1 / 1 shared
Rowley, Peter
1 / 2 shared
Chart of publication period
2017
2016

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Parwani, Rachna Narendra
  • Curto, Marco
  • Tozzi, Gianluca
  • Barber, Asa
  • Kao, Alex
  • Parwani, Rachna
  • Rowley, Peter
OrganizationsLocationPeople

document

4D printing biomimetic tissue structures using correlative approaches

  • Parwani, Rachna Narendra
  • Curto, Marco
  • Pani, Martino
  • Tozzi, Gianluca
  • Barber, Asa
Abstract

The human musculoskeletal system is a biological composite of hard and soft material phases organized into a complex 3D structure. The replication of mechanical properties in 3-dimensional space, so called ‘4D’ techniques, therefore promises next-generation of prosthetics and engineering structures for the musculoskeletal system. Approaches using in situ indentation of tissue correlated with micro computed tomography (μCT) are used here to provide a 4D data set that is representative of the native tissue at high fidelity. Multi-material 3D printing is exploited to realize the collected 4D data set by using materials with a wide range of mechanical properties and printing structures representative of native tissue. We demonstrate this correlative approach to reproduce bone structures and highlight a workflow approach of indentation, μCT and 3D printing to potentially mimic any structure found in the musculoskeletal system.<br/><br/>Structures in the human musculoskeletal system, such as bone [1] and tendon-bone connective tissue [2], can be considered as complex composites of hard and soft materials. Development of prosthetics capable of replacing body parts lost to trauma, disease or congenital conditions requires the accurate replication of the required body part. 3D printing promises considerable advantages over other manufacturing methods in mimicking native tissue, including the ability to produce complex structures [3]. However, accurate representation of whole body parts down to tissue microstructures requires correlative approaches where mechanical properties in 3-dimensional space are known. The objective of this study is to apply in situ indentation, correlate to 3D imaging of bone using μCT and finally 3D print mimicked structures.<br/><br/>Samples of bovine compact bone were imaged at high resolution using μCT (Xradia Versa 510, Zeiss, USA). A custom build in situ micro indentation setup within the μCT was used to map the mechanical properties of the bone at multiple positions. Correlation between sample x-ray attenuation and corresponding elastic modulus found from indentation was established. Data was converted to a 4D data set of elastic modulus values in 3D space, segmented and exported to the 3D printer. An inkjet 3D printer (Projet 5500X, 3D Systems, USA) was used to print materials with a range of mechanical properties that approach those found in the native bone material. Macroscopic testing on both bone samples and 3D printed samples were carried out using standard compression (Instron, UK).<br/><br/>Preliminary results indicated similarity between 3D printed structures and native bone tissue. Macroscopic testing of bone samples and 3D printed equivalents showed additional similarities in stress-strain behaviour.<br/><br/>Our preliminary work presented here indicates that the workflow of 3D imaging correlated to point mechanical measurements using indentation is suitable to give a 4D dataset that is representative of the native bone tissue. 3D printing is able to produce structures that start to mimick bone but are critically dependent on the data segmentation, particularly averaging imaging data to a resolution that is appropriate for the 3D printer.

Topics
  • impedance spectroscopy
  • microstructure
  • phase
  • tomography
  • stress-strain behavior
  • composite