Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Battisti, Markus

  • Google
  • 2
  • 4
  • 0

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (2/2 displayed)

  • 2016Optimization of twin screw extrusion using CFD for polymer/nanoclay compositescitations
  • 2015Optimization of Twin Screw Extrusion using CFD for Polymer/Nanoclay Compositescitations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Friesenbichler, Walter
2 / 3 shared
Holzer, Clemens
2 / 65 shared
Schuschnigg, Stephan
2 / 34 shared
Winkler-Ebner, Joachim
2 / 2 shared
Chart of publication period
2016
2015

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Friesenbichler, Walter
  • Holzer, Clemens
  • Schuschnigg, Stephan
  • Winkler-Ebner, Joachim
OrganizationsLocationPeople

article

Optimization of twin screw extrusion using CFD for polymer/nanoclay composites

  • Friesenbichler, Walter
  • Holzer, Clemens
  • Schuschnigg, Stephan
  • Battisti, Markus
  • Winkler-Ebner, Joachim
Abstract

The aim of this research was the optimization of a co-rotating twin screw extruder for processing polypropylene with layered silicates. The various input parameters of the process itself such as screw speed, flow rate, temperature and pressure as well as the great variety of screw configurations lead to an enormous amount of experimental runs for the optimization. By using CFD simulations some of these parameters can be varied without the need for experiments. In order to verify the simulated results, experimental runs have been performed. The compounded materials consisted of 90 wt% PP (Bormed DM55 pharm or BB 412 E both from Borealis) with 5 wt% compatibilizer (BYK Scona TPPP 2112GA) and 5 wt% layered silicate (Rockwood Nanofil®5). The viscosity was measured using different rheometers, as an input parameter for the isothermal simulations. The pressure profiles, mixing index and dissipative energy input along the screw elements were simulated utilizing Polyflow simulation package from Ansys Inc.. The regions where the simulations showed zero pressure where assumed to be starved regions. These regions were also be verified in the “screw pull out” experiments. In addition the pressure was measured along the screw and compared to the simulations. The experiments where done with the polymer nanocomposites injection molding compounder (PNC-IMC), consisting of a Leistritz ZSE 27 MAXX 44D compounder and an Engel e-motion 740/180T injection molding machine. The final part (tensile specimen or plates for SAXS measurements) were processed directly with the PNC-IMC with only one plasticizing process. Instead of backward conveying elements, the optimized screw consisted of mixing and kneading elements leading to lower pressures and lower dissipative energy inputs and a longer residence time. The exfoliation of layered silicates and therefore the tensile strength of the material are often related to the shearing and residence time. However, the longer residence time in these experiments, did not compensate the lower dissipative energy input. The SAXS measurement also showed that the standard geometry had a higher exfoliation rate than the optimized screw.

Topics
  • nanocomposite
  • polymer
  • experiment
  • simulation
  • extrusion
  • twin screw extrusion
  • strength
  • layered
  • viscosity
  • tensile strength
  • injection molding
  • small angle x-ray scattering