Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Grahn, M.

  • Google
  • 2
  • 10
  • 9

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (2/2 displayed)

  • 2008Polymeric barrier membranes for device packaging, diffusive control and biocompatibility9citations
  • 2007Complex electronic implants and polymer packaging needscitations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Rehman, Ihtesham Ur
2 / 71 shared
Wasikiewicz, J. M.
1 / 3 shared
Ateh, D.
1 / 1 shared
Paul, D.
1 / 6 shared
Vadgama, P.
2 / 4 shared
Roohpour, N.
1 / 10 shared
Schoenleber, M.
1 / 1 shared
Vaghela, J.
1 / 1 shared
Popa, C.
1 / 1 shared
Ismail, F.
1 / 2 shared
Chart of publication period
2008
2007

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Rehman, Ihtesham Ur
  • Wasikiewicz, J. M.
  • Ateh, D.
  • Paul, D.
  • Vadgama, P.
  • Roohpour, N.
  • Schoenleber, M.
  • Vaghela, J.
  • Popa, C.
  • Ismail, F.
OrganizationsLocationPeople

document

Complex electronic implants and polymer packaging needs

  • Schoenleber, M.
  • Rehman, Ihtesham Ur
  • Vaghela, J.
  • Popa, C.
  • Grahn, M.
  • Vadgama, P.
  • Ismail, F.
Abstract

Implantable and direct contact electronic devices for underpinning complex tissue functions as well as physiological monitoring have the opportunity to revolutionize health care in an ageing population. A major EU-consortium of 25 partners has been developing electronic devices for functional electrical stimulation, glaucoma and CNS pressure monitoring and as cochlear, retinal and urethral implants. A key need, however, is the packaging of such complex devices to enhance tissue biocompatibility, and to protect conducting elements from in vivo corrosion during extended use. Accordingly, we have investigated candidate polymeric barriers as hydration resistant and solute impermeable in interphases to mitigate the major problems of chronic implantation. Materials include silicone rubber, PVC, polyurethane, sulphonated polyetherether sulphone polyether-sulphone (SPEES-PES) and polycarbonate as underlayer and carbon like carbon (DLC), sol-gel modified oxides and Parylene C for top layers. A key strategy is polymer modification through incorporation variously of surfactant (Aliquat 336) and synthetic lipid (isopropyl myristate) to manipulate permeability to water and to low molecular weight solutes. Surface biocompatibility was assessed on the basis of protein film deposition in vitro and by cell viability studies in tissue culture. Polypyrrole deposited on gold coatings was used as a substrate for cell testing. None of the materials tested showed short-term toxicity, though there were substantial differences in hydration. Results with polypyrrole suggest that both electrical conductivity and tissue interfacing to be viable if used as coatings over active electrode components. © International Federation for Medical and Biological Engineering 2007.

Topics
  • Deposition
  • impedance spectroscopy
  • surface
  • Carbon
  • corrosion
  • gold
  • permeability
  • aging
  • molecular weight
  • toxicity
  • rubber
  • electrical conductivity
  • photoelectron spectroscopy
  • biocompatibility
  • surfactant