Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Omar, Noshin

  • Google
  • 7
  • 31
  • 219

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (7/7 displayed)

  • 2018Low-temperature aging mechanisms of commercial graphite/LiFePO4 cells cycled with a simulated electric vehicle load profile—A post-mortem study59citations
  • 2018Low-temperature aging mechanisms of commercial graphite/LiFePO 4 cells cycled with a simulated electric vehicle load profile—A post-mortem study59citations
  • 2016Batteries 2020 – Lithium - ion battery first and second life ageing, validated battery models, lifetime modelling and ageing assessment of thermal parameters47citations
  • 2012Rechargeable Energy Storage Systems for Plug-in Hybrid Electric Vehicles-Assessment of Electrical Characteristicscitations
  • 2010Evaluation of performance characteristics of various lithium-ion batteries for use in BEV application54citations
  • 2010Evaluation of performance characteristics of various lithium batteries for use in BEV applicationcitations
  • 2010Assessment of Performance Characteristics of Lithium-Ion Batteries for PHEV Vehicles Applications Based on a Newly Test Methodologycitations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Kallio, Tanja
2 / 38 shared
Jalkanen, Kirsi
2 / 2 shared
Rauhala, Taina
2 / 2 shared
Romann, Tavo
2 / 4 shared
Lust, Enn
2 / 8 shared
Timmermans, Jean-Marc
1 / 2 shared
Nikolian, Alexandros
1 / 1 shared
Hoog, Joris De
1 / 1 shared
Gopalakrishnan, Rahul
1 / 1 shared
Coosemans, Thierry
2 / 3 shared
Goutam, Shovon
1 / 1 shared
Martinez-Laserna, Egoitz
1 / 1 shared
Sarasketa-Zabala, Elixabet
1 / 1 shared
Gastelurrutia, Jon
1 / 1 shared
Mierlo, Joeri Van
1 / 1 shared
Warnecke, Alexander
1 / 1 shared
Nieto, Nerea
1 / 1 shared
Sauer, Dirk Uwe
1 / 2 shared
Stroe, Daniel-Ioan
1 / 5 shared
Swierczynski, Maciej Jozef
1 / 4 shared
Daowd, Mohamed Ali Abdelfattah Hamoda
3 / 3 shared
Hegazy, Omar
1 / 3 shared
Van Den Bossche, Peter
4 / 6 shared
Van Mierlo, Joeri
4 / 16 shared
Smekens, Jelle
1 / 2 shared
Pauwels, Stijn
1 / 1 shared
Dhaens, Miguel
1 / 1 shared
Daowd, Mohamed
1 / 1 shared
Mulder, Grietus
3 / 3 shared
Verbrugge, Bavo
3 / 3 shared
Pauwels, S.
1 / 1 shared
Chart of publication period
2018
2016
2012
2010

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Kallio, Tanja
  • Jalkanen, Kirsi
  • Rauhala, Taina
  • Romann, Tavo
  • Lust, Enn
  • Timmermans, Jean-Marc
  • Nikolian, Alexandros
  • Hoog, Joris De
  • Gopalakrishnan, Rahul
  • Coosemans, Thierry
  • Goutam, Shovon
  • Martinez-Laserna, Egoitz
  • Sarasketa-Zabala, Elixabet
  • Gastelurrutia, Jon
  • Mierlo, Joeri Van
  • Warnecke, Alexander
  • Nieto, Nerea
  • Sauer, Dirk Uwe
  • Stroe, Daniel-Ioan
  • Swierczynski, Maciej Jozef
  • Daowd, Mohamed Ali Abdelfattah Hamoda
  • Hegazy, Omar
  • Van Den Bossche, Peter
  • Van Mierlo, Joeri
  • Smekens, Jelle
  • Pauwels, Stijn
  • Dhaens, Miguel
  • Daowd, Mohamed
  • Mulder, Grietus
  • Verbrugge, Bavo
  • Pauwels, S.
OrganizationsLocationPeople

document

Assessment of Performance Characteristics of Lithium-Ion Batteries for PHEV Vehicles Applications Based on a Newly Test Methodology

  • Daowd, Mohamed Ali Abdelfattah Hamoda
  • Pauwels, S.
  • Omar, Noshin
  • Van Den Bossche, Peter
  • Van Mierlo, Joeri
  • Mulder, Grietus
  • Verbrugge, Bavo
Abstract

This paper presents the performance characteristics of ten commercial lithium-ion brands of various chemistries for use in Plug-in Hybrid Electric Vehicle applications. The cells chemistries are based on iron phosphate, nickel manganese cobalt oxide and nickel cobalt aluminum in the positive electrode. The experimental results indicate that nickel manganese cobalt oxide based cells show the best energy density in the range of 126 - 149Wh/kg compared to 75 - 118Wh/kg for cells using iron phosphate in the positive electrode. The results illustrate that the power densities of the most iron phosphate cells varies between 320 and 1650 W/kg. The variation in W/kg can be explained that some of the tested cells (higher than 20Ah) are primarily suitable for Battery Electric Vehicle applications rather than PHEVs. While the energy and power capabilities of nickel cobalt aluminum based cells seem to have less favorable performances: 90Wh/kg and 290W/kg. From the point-of-view of energy efficiency LiNiCoMnO2 technology show favorable performances around the 95% compared to 88 - 90% for the other battery chemistries. The good performances of LiNiCoMnO2 cells are mainly due to the higher nominal voltage, good electrode specific capacities and a good specific impedance. <br/>In the framework of this research, a new modified equation has been proposed in order to calculate the state of charge of lithium-ion batteries. However, the equation can be also useful for other battery technologies as lead-acid and nickel metal hydride. This equation contains important aspects which are related to a battery behavior such as energy efficiency in function of state of charge, current, temperature and cycle life. Furthermore, the influence of the Peukert constant in function of temperature and cycle life has been integrated. <br/>In this report, the thermal behavior of several batteries design concepts under discharge conditions has been investigated. The analysis showed that the heat development in prismatic cells is mostly located at the terminals. While, the heat production in cylindrical cells is more homogeneous. Due to the relative available little surface area in cylindrical cells, the external and internal temperature gradient becomes greater. Therefore, the heat distribution for both battery design concepts is not optimal which results primarily in less capacity that the battery can deliver. In the case of pouch cells, the heat development is less dramatic due to the larger external surface and lower temperature gradient. <br/>Then, the cost and cycle life considerations for the proposed batteries have been analyzed. According to the USABC requirements, only iron phosphate based batteries can reach the goal of 200 - 300$/kWh. From the standpoint of the cycle life, there is no battery technology on the market which can meet the objectives of 5000 cycles. The average cycle life of most commercial lithium-ion batteries is in the range of 1000 - 1200 cycles according to data sheets (100% DoD). <br/>In this research a new test methodology has been developed at the Vrije Universiteit Brussel and VITO research institute which is able to investigate all the evaluation criteria as discussed above. <br/>In addition, the proposed methodology can provide all necessary parameters for several battery models as FreedomCar, second order FreemdomCar, Thevenin and Shepered.

Topics
  • density
  • impedance spectroscopy
  • surface
  • energy density
  • nickel
  • aluminium
  • laser emission spectroscopy
  • cobalt
  • Lithium
  • iron
  • Manganese