Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Lenau, Torben Anker

  • Google
  • 5
  • 7
  • 62

Technical University of Denmark

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (5/5 displayed)

  • 2020Fungal future: a review of mycelium biocomposites as an ecological alternative insulation material43citations
  • 2012Casting traceability with direct part marking using reconfigurable pin-type tooling based on paraffin–graphite actuators19citations
  • 2009Interactive Sample Book (ISB):An Inspirational Tool for Smart Textilescitations
  • 2009Interactive Sample Book (ISB)citations
  • 2008New and smart materials - why and howcitations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Mckay, Lukas
1 / 1 shared
Robertson, Owen
1 / 1 shared
Høgdal, Frederik
1 / 1 shared
Vedel-Smith, Nikolaj Kjelgaard
1 / 9 shared
Guglielmi, Michel
2 / 2 shared
Heimdal, Elisabeth Jacobsen
2 / 2 shared
Johannessen, Hanne-Louise
2 / 2 shared
Chart of publication period
2020
2012
2009
2008

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Mckay, Lukas
  • Robertson, Owen
  • Høgdal, Frederik
  • Vedel-Smith, Nikolaj Kjelgaard
  • Guglielmi, Michel
  • Heimdal, Elisabeth Jacobsen
  • Johannessen, Hanne-Louise
OrganizationsLocationPeople

document

New and smart materials - why and how

  • Lenau, Torben Anker
Abstract

A first question when talking about new materials is why we should use them – are the traditional old materials not sufficient? Take for example an old farmhouse made with timber framing and thatched roof. It is made from materials like wood, reed, clay, chalk and linseed oil. They are found locally and easy to replace, repair and dispose of. Furthermore do we face a number of challenges using the new materials. There is less experience in using them, the risk is higher, and investments are likely to be higher. So there are good reasons to stick to the old well known materials.And yet the new materials are interesting. Why? Because we can achieve a long range of new and improved physical properties like durability, weight, strength, appearance, environment and the unit cost can be reduced. Furthermore do the new materials open for more advanced and sophisticated semiotic properties.The semiotic properties are becoming more and more important since consumers more increasingly select between products based on the meaning they associate to the product appearance. Semiotics is the study of signs and symbols and described by authors like Pierce and Saussure. Customer preferences also keep changing over time and an important question to producers are therefore which appearance preferences the customers will demand in the future. A model for how to perform foresight and translate this into consumer trends is presented together with a facility called the future tool that support designers with inspirations and material samples. The present version of the future tool is based on the theme 'safe haven'.

Topics
  • impedance spectroscopy
  • laser emission spectroscopy
  • strength
  • durability
  • wood