Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Watson, James Martin

  • Google
  • 2
  • 4
  • 0

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (2/2 displayed)

  • 2018Surface-Breaking Flaw Detection in Mild Steel Welds using Quantum Well Hall Effect Sensor Devicescitations
  • 2018A Comparative Study of Electromagnetic NDE Methods and Quantum Well Hall Effect Sensor Imaging for Surface-Flaw Detection in Mild Steel Weldscitations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Sexton, James
2 / 8 shared
Biruu, Dr Firew Abera
2 / 8 shared
Missous, Mohamed
2 / 28 shared
Liang, Chen-Wei
2 / 4 shared
Chart of publication period
2018

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Sexton, James
  • Biruu, Dr Firew Abera
  • Missous, Mohamed
  • Liang, Chen-Wei
OrganizationsLocationPeople

document

A Comparative Study of Electromagnetic NDE Methods and Quantum Well Hall Effect Sensor Imaging for Surface-Flaw Detection in Mild Steel Welds

  • Sexton, James
  • Biruu, Dr Firew Abera
  • Watson, James Martin
  • Missous, Mohamed
  • Liang, Chen-Wei
Abstract

Following on from the success and industrial interest in Non-Destructive Evaluation (NDE) applications of Quantum Well Hall Effect (QWHE) sensors, a study was conducted to establish the detection capabilities and general performance of low frequency QWHE imaging for surface-breaking flaw detection and comparing them to Magnetic Particle Inspection (MPI), Eddy Current Testing (ECT) and Alternating Current Field Measurement (ACFM). <br/> <br/>In this study, a probe consisting of a QWHE sensor, illuminating electromagnet and sensor circuitry was controlled using an automated XY scanner with a measurement step size of 250 µm to simulate an integrated array of QWHE sensors of 250 µm pitch. This probe was used to apply a 3 mT 100 Hz frequency magnetic field to map the surface magnetic field and Magnetic Flux Leakage (MFL) response of five bespoke dressed mild steel weld samples made by Sonaspection. <br/> <br/>These samples contained 15 surface-breaking flaws of varying length from 3 to 11 mm; mainly longitudinal toe and centre-line cracks, representative of certain typical industrial requirements of one of our industrial partners. <br/> <br/>The same samples were also subjected to MPI, ECT and ACFM provided by leading industrial companies using their own qualified personnel, equipment and procedures. The outcomes and performance of each NDE technique including QWHE imaging were then compared and evaluated.

Topics
  • surface
  • crack
  • steel