Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Sanchez, Paul

  • Google
  • 2
  • 2
  • 0

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (2/2 displayed)

  • 2018Surface failure conditions for cohesive rubble pilescitations
  • 2018Influence of the particle size distribution on the cohesive strength of granular asteroidscitations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Scheeres, Daniel J.
2 / 7 shared
Sautel, Jeremy
1 / 2 shared
Chart of publication period
2018

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Scheeres, Daniel J.
  • Sautel, Jeremy
OrganizationsLocationPeople

document

Surface failure conditions for cohesive rubble piles

  • Scheeres, Daniel J.
  • Sanchez, Paul
Abstract

The presence of small amounts of cohesive strength has been predicted and documented in rubble pile asteroids. Even cohesive strengths on the order of 10's of Pascals can have a dramatic effect on the failure conditions and behavior of granular material on asteroid surfaces. In this presentation we report on a new analytical theory for failure of an asteroid surface that accounts for cohesive strength. The theory assumes that the interior of the asteroid does not fail before the surface and is validated with detailed numerical simulations on a spherical, rotating body. The theory is expressed in terms of non-dimensional parameters and thus can be applied across a wide range of situations. Specifically, this theoretical understanding allows surface failure phenomenon to be predicted from fine regolith on small, rapidly spinning asteroids to meter-sized boulders on larger bodies with slower rotation rates. The theory identifies three distinct regimes of granular matter failure as a function of the relative strength of cohesion, as defined by the bond number (the ratio of cohesive strength to a granular particle's weight). For bond numbers less than unity, failure occurs via landslides in two ways. First, for low cohesion, landslides start at a fixed latitude defined by the granular material angle of friction. For larger bond numbers, but less than unity, the initial failure point transitions to higher latitudes and lies at the boundary between fission and landslide failure. For a bond number greater than unity, failure first occurs at the equator by the fission of material from the surface. When in this regime, particles that fail will in general be placed on hyperbolic orbits and immediately escape. This demarcates the beginning of the "disaggregation" phase of rubble pile asteroids and occurs for bodies < 300 m. It is also interesting to note that for any bond number, failure near the poles of a spinning body always occurs via landslides. The presentation will describe the theory and its main predictions, review the numerical confirmation of the approach and present a number of implications for the interpretation of in situ observations of asteroids. This work is supported by NASA grant 80NSSC18K0491....

Topics
  • impedance spectroscopy
  • surface
  • phase
  • theory
  • simulation
  • laser emission spectroscopy
  • strength
  • spinning