Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Bailey, Sarah

  • Google
  • 2
  • 5
  • 0

University of Bath

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (2/2 displayed)

  • 2024Investigating the use of the splash test to assess antidepressant drug effects in C57BL/6 micecitations
  • 2018Investigating the effects of sex on depression-related behaviour evoked by kappa opioid receptor activation in the forced swim testcitations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Husbands, Stephen
1 / 4 shared
Liu, Nairong
1 / 1 shared
Sadler, Annelisa
1 / 1 shared
Lalji, Hasnain
1 / 1 shared
Bailey, Chris
1 / 8 shared
Chart of publication period
2024
2018

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Husbands, Stephen
  • Liu, Nairong
  • Sadler, Annelisa
  • Lalji, Hasnain
  • Bailey, Chris
OrganizationsLocationPeople

document

Investigating the effects of sex on depression-related behaviour evoked by kappa opioid receptor activation in the forced swim test

  • Bailey, Sarah
  • Sadler, Annelisa
  • Lalji, Hasnain
  • Bailey, Chris
Abstract

Introduction: Emerging evidence across a number of disciplines highlight that there are significant sex differences in psychopharmacology (Bolea et al. J Psychopharmacol. 2018; 32; p125-133). Kappa opioid (KOP) receptors play a role in the response to stress and have been investigated as potential targets for the treatment of psychiatric disorders including depression and drug dependence (Carlezon & Krystal. Depress Anxiety. 2016; 33; p895-906). Studies have shown the sexual dimorphic nature of the response to KOP receptor activation in preclinical behavioural tasks, for example; California mice develop a conditioned place aversion at different doses of U50,488. In addition, the females show a biphasic response to U50488 but not the males (AR Laman-Maharg et al. Behav Brain Res. 2017; 332; p299-307). Here we have investigated the effects of the KOP receptor agonist, U50,488, on behaviours in the forced swim test in C57BL/6J and CD1 mice of both sexes.Methods: Adult female and male C57BL/6J and CD1 mice (7-10 weeks) were housed in groups of 4. Female and male mice received either saline (0.9%) or U50,488 (0.1mg/kg, 1mg/kg or 5mg/kg) subcutaneously at a volume of 10ml/kg and n=5-8 per treatment group. Pilot studies evaluated the locomotor effects of U50,488 in an open field test. Drugs were administered 45 min prior to testing in a 6 min forced swim test.A video camera, Sony-DCR-SR52, was used to record the mice’s behaviour and behaviour in the final 4 minutes was analysed, blind to treatment. Two way ANOVA was used to assess the effects of sex and treatment (InVivoStat).Results: There was a significant effect of treatment with U50,488 on time spent immobile in the forced swim test in CD1 mice (F (3, 48) = 13.10, P<0.0001) but not C57BL/6J mice (F (3, 46) = 0.38, P=0.77). There was no significant effect of sex on immobility behaviour in the forced swim test in either mouse strain (F (1, 48) =0.21, P=0.65; F (1, 46) =0.36, P=0.55). Pairwise analysis of U50,488’s effects showed a significant increase in the time spent immobile in both male and female CD1 mice at 5mg/kg (P<0.001) but the 0.1 mg/kg dose only produced a significant effect in male mice(P<0.05).Conclusions: Taken together, the results show that KOP receptor activation by U50,488 causes a pro-depressant effect in both female and male CD1 mice, at doses that are without significant locomotor effects. There were no significant effects of sex in these studies although male CD1 mice may be more susceptible to the prodepressant effects of KOP activation than their female counterparts as lower doses of U50,488 produced a significant increase in the time spent immobile. There is clear evidence of a difference in responding to KOP receptor activation between strains, highlighting again the importance of strain specific differences in preclinical behavioural studies (Lucki et al. Psychopharmacology (Berl).2001; 155; p315-322).

Topics
  • impedance spectroscopy
  • activation