Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Gatuzz, E.

  • Google
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (1/1 displayed)

  • 2017Toccata and Fugue in Fe Majorcitations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
García, J.
1 / 6 shared
Chart of publication period
2017

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • García, J.
OrganizationsLocationPeople

document

Toccata and Fugue in Fe Major

  • Gatuzz, E.
  • García, J.
Abstract

With the advent of X-ray space telescopes (Chandra, XMM-Newton, Suzaku) at the turn of the century, high-resolution spectroscopy has become a powerful technique for studying in amazing detail a large variety of astronomical sources [1]. While many of them are indeed exotic, e.g. galaxy clusters, supermassive black holes, and supernova remnants, others are somewhat more familiar such as the interstellar medium (ISM) of our galaxy. In any case, the iron K and L lines and edges have proven to be the most coveted spectral items considering their plasma diagnostic capabilities, and because Fe abundance variations provide measures of cosmic evolution, galactic gradients, and gas-to-grain fractions. However, the reliability of such plasma diagnostics is currently the subject of heated controversies, three of which are briefly reviewed in the present paper. Toccata - 3C/3D line ratio in Fe XVII. Emission L-shell lines (n = 3-2) of this species are dominant features in the spectra of hot (1-7 MK) bodies, but their diagnostic potential has been limited by a weaker-than-predicted resonance line. Although it was earlier assumed that the collisional data were faulty, a persistent discrepancy in the experimental and theoretical 3C/3D f-value ratios has given rise an entrenched polemic [2,3]. Nonlinear dynamical modeling and nonequilibrium plasma effects have also been invoked [4, 5]. Fugue - ISM Fe abundance. Modeling of the Fe L edge in the ISM absorption spectra towards low-mass X-ray binaries (LMXBs) would in principle allow the determination of the gas-to-solid abundance ratio. Fe is expected to be mostly in grains, but the composition and morphology of these compounds is still unclear [6,7]: is it in amorphous silicates or metallic form? We have analyzed high-resolution Chandra spectra of the available LMXBs to identify absorption features in the Fe L-edge region; in addition to metallic iron, we found O VII lines but no evidence of absorption features due to atomic iron. Coda - Fe abundance in black-hole accretion disks. Fe K emission lines reflected from the innermost regions are broadened and skewed by Doppler and gravitational effects, providing information about the black-hole spin. However, spectral models have been seriously questioned as supersolar Fe abundances are required, which is believed to be caused by their inapplicability at very high densities (> 1018 cm-3) where the atomic data are believed to be modified by plasma effects, e.g. continuum lowering in the photoionization cross sections [8].

Topics
  • impedance spectroscopy
  • compound
  • cluster
  • amorphous
  • grain
  • iron