Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Gosiewski, Jan

  • Google
  • 1
  • 2
  • 0

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (1/1 displayed)

  • 2017Validated cemented socket model for optimising acetabular fixationcitations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Gill, H. S.
1 / 18 shared
Gheduzzi, Sabina
1 / 8 shared
Chart of publication period
2017

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Gill, H. S.
  • Gheduzzi, Sabina
OrganizationsLocationPeople

document

Validated cemented socket model for optimising acetabular fixation

  • Gill, H. S.
  • Gheduzzi, Sabina
  • Gosiewski, Jan
Abstract

Introduction<br/><br/>The THR is the second most successful and cost-effective surgical procedure of all time. Data shows that hip cup failure is a significant problem. The aim of this study is to improve methods of cemented cup fixation through validation experiments and FEA.<br/><br/>Methods<br/><br/>Five Sawbones composite pelves with cemented UHMWPE cups were tested. Each pelvis was instrumented with triaxial strain gauges at four locations of predicted high strain. Each sample (n = 5) was bolted at the sacroiliac joint in a uniaxial testing machine. A load of 500 N was applied in the direction of the peak force during normal walking, for five repetitions. The directional surface strains were used to evaluate the equivalent strain. Specimen specific finite element models were developed based on CT scan data using ScanIP. Each mesh consisted of an average of 2.5 million linear tetrahedral elements and was solved in ANSYS.<br/><br/>Results<br/><br/>The experimentally measured strains were compared against the finite element predictions. The mean linear gradients and SD of the mean at each gauge location were: 1.00 (16%), 0.78 (17%), 0.90 (13%) and 1.05 (4%).<br/><br/>Discussion<br/><br/>The agreement between the predicted and experimental equivalent strains was good, but varied across the population. This was caused by the variation in mechanical properties between specimens, and the sensitivity of the gauges to location (steep surface strain gradients). This is most evident with the second strain gauge (0.78, 17%), which is at a suboptimal location.<br/><br/>This specific methodology of conducting finite element analyses of the pelvis based on CT image data has been validated. The same methodology has been used to develop a patient specific FEA model, including a bone remodelling algorithm and muscle forces, based on the CT images from the Virtual Human Project. This model is currently being used to optimize the cemented fixation and will be verified experimentally using composite pelves. This research is aimed at informing clinical practice and enhancing long-term cemented fixation. Reducing the need for revision surgery will greatly improve patient quality of life, whilst also reducing the burden on the healthcare delivery system.

Topics
  • impedance spectroscopy
  • surface
  • experiment
  • composite
  • finite element analysis
  • hot isostatic pressing
  • computed tomography scan