Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Prewett, Philip D.

  • Google
  • 2
  • 5
  • 2

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (2/2 displayed)

  • 2017Liquid-like behaviour of gold nanowire bridges2citations
  • 2014Pixel spacing effects for nanofabrication using focused ion beamcitations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Cheneler, David
1 / 15 shared
Naik, Jay P.
1 / 1 shared
Bowen, James
2 / 51 shared
Sabouri, Aydin
1 / 3 shared
Anthony, Carl J.
1 / 2 shared
Chart of publication period
2017
2014

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Cheneler, David
  • Naik, Jay P.
  • Bowen, James
  • Sabouri, Aydin
  • Anthony, Carl J.
OrganizationsLocationPeople

document

Pixel spacing effects for nanofabrication using focused ion beam

  • Sabouri, Aydin
  • Prewett, Philip D.
  • Anthony, Carl J.
  • Bowen, James
Abstract

Focused ion beam (FIB) systems are widely used as a versatile tool for nanofabrication prototyping, device modification and ion beam lithography. However, there are still many unexplored effects due to the different methods that ion implantation could perform during FIB milling using Ga as a liquid metal ion source. In this report we studied the effects of pixel spacing when FIB is used for direct milling of a substrate at different milling currents for constant implantation doses.<br></br><br></br>The experiment consists of FIB milling of a Si substrate at 30 keV using currents of 50 pA and 100 pA for a dose of 5×10<sup>16</sup> ions/cm<sup>2</sup>. The dwell time was set to be 1 μs and the pixel spacing varied from 6.2 nm to 34.2 nm. The surface topographies of machined regions were examined using the atomic force microscope and the quality is described by comparing the intensities of a crystal to amorphous peak of the recorded trace from Raman spectroscopy measurements. This method was introduced by Wagner.<br></br><br></br>In order to more accurately consider the sputtering yield the effect of second order deposition was neglected. It was observed that by increasing the pixel spacing the sputtering yield starts to increase and then gradually decreases for both currents. Ion implantation breaks the crystal structure and the process involves displacement of the atoms from the atomic rows which consequently increases the effect of de-channeling in ion implantation. The increase in sputtering yield could be because of the enhanced de-channeling which is due to the changes of the substrate structure which increases the collisions between implanted ions and the substrate atoms. After a threshold, the sputtering yield gradually decreases, which is due to having less implanted ions per unit of volume for each scan and therefore less applied damage.<br></br><br></br>Pixel spacing at different currents and dose rates can yield different behavior due to the concentration of implanted ions per pixel dwell time. In our study the maximum concentration of implanted ions per pixel dwell time is about 5×10<sup>17</sup> ions/cm<sup>3</sup> and 10<sup>18</sup> ions/cm<sup>3</sup> for currents of 50 pA and 100 pA respectively; this concentration is lower than 10<sup>19</sup> ions/cm<sup>3</sup> which is the saturation point of Ga solubility in Si.It was observed that increasing the pixel spacing leads to rougher surfaces. It was also found that the quality of Si is at its highest when the pixel spacing is 14.8 nm. This is consistent with the topography results which were described by the de-channeling effect. As the de-channeling increases, the depth of implanted ions is decreased, and therefore fewer layers of substrate are damaged.<br></br><br></br>In this study, we investigated the effect of FIB milling pixel spacing on substrate physical and structural changes at a dose of 5×10<sup>16</sup> ions/cm<sup>2</sup>. We observed the sputtering yield is first increased and then decreased, which is mainly due to structural changes in substrate. The quality of substrate was also studied, revealing less damage when the pixel spacing is 14.8 nm for both currents.

Topics
  • Deposition
  • impedance spectroscopy
  • surface
  • amorphous
  • experiment
  • grinding
  • laser emission spectroscopy
  • milling
  • focused ion beam
  • Raman spectroscopy
  • lithography