Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Røsjorde, Audun

  • Google
  • 3
  • 7
  • 49

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (3/3 displayed)

  • 2014Exergy destruction and losses on four North Sea offshore platforms: A comparative study of the oil and gas processing plants49citations
  • 2013Performance indicators for evaluation of North Sea oil and gas platformscitations
  • 2013Comparative study of the sources of exergy destruction on four North Sea oil and gas platformscitations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Ertesvåg, Ivan S.
1 / 1 shared
Elmegaard, Brian
3 / 6 shared
Jøssang, Knut
2 / 2 shared
Kjelstrup, Signe
3 / 5 shared
Voldsund, Mari
3 / 3 shared
He, Wei
1 / 3 shared
Ertesvåg, Ivar Ståle
2 / 2 shared
Chart of publication period
2014
2013

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Ertesvåg, Ivan S.
  • Elmegaard, Brian
  • Jøssang, Knut
  • Kjelstrup, Signe
  • Voldsund, Mari
  • He, Wei
  • Ertesvåg, Ivar Ståle
OrganizationsLocationPeople

document

Performance indicators for evaluation of North Sea oil and gas platforms

  • Røsjorde, Audun
  • He, Wei
  • Ertesvåg, Ivar Ståle
  • Elmegaard, Brian
  • Kjelstrup, Signe
  • Voldsund, Mari
Abstract

Well-defined performance indicators can motivate optimal operation of offshore oil and gas platforms. This paper aims to develop such parameters, indicating possibilities for reducing power consumption and emissions of pollutants. Different platforms have different oilfield conditions and process specifications. Such conditions determine the theoretical minimum work required to operate the platforms, and can have a high impact on the power consumption. We introduce performance indicators based on energy and exergy. The specific energy use and specific exergy consumption evaluate the resources spent to produce the exported petroleum. The best-available-technology efficiency compares the current energy use with the energy use if state-of-the-art components replace current compressors and pumps. Exergetic efficiency compares the actual resources spent in the current process with the minimum resources required under ideal conditions (i.e. reversible operation), and specific exergy destruction illustrates the amount of resources lost due to irreversibilities. We use these indicators to evaluate the oil and gas processing at four different North Sea platforms that differ by the field lifetime, system configuration and reservoir properties. Both the specific energy use and the specific exergy consumption ranged between 20 and 667 MJ/Sm3 o.e. in the four cases.The best-available-technology efficiencies showed that the energy use of the different platforms could be reduced by 17% to 44% if the most efficient technologies existing on the market were used. The exergetic efficiencies were 99.4% – 99.9%, 50% – 84% or 2% - 46%, depending on the interpretation of product exergy and fuel/utilized exergy, while specific exergy destruction ranged from 17 to 162 MJ/Sm3 o.e. The platforms with best performances in specific energy use and exergy consumption did not necessarily have the highest best-available-technology or exergetic efficiencies. This illustrates the importance of considering different types of indicators when evaluating the performance of oil and gas platforms.

Topics