Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Webb, J. J. C.

  • Google
  • 1
  • 2
  • 0

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (1/1 displayed)

  • 2006Mechanical characterisation of three percutaneous vertebroplasty biomaterialscitations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Miles, A. W.
1 / 2 shared
Gheduzzi, Sabina
1 / 8 shared
Chart of publication period
2006

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Miles, A. W.
  • Gheduzzi, Sabina
OrganizationsLocationPeople

article

Mechanical characterisation of three percutaneous vertebroplasty biomaterials

  • Miles, A. W.
  • Gheduzzi, Sabina
  • Webb, J. J. C.
Abstract

Percutanous vertebroplasty (PVP) is gaining popularity for the treatment of vertebral compression fractures. The need of obtaining low viscosity materials for injection through small bore needles and the necessity of visualising the fluid flow during injection have led users to the formulation of a number of ad-hoc recipes aimed at adapting PMMA cements for this use. Industry, on its part, has addressed these requirements by developing specific products for this application. This study aimed at providing a direct comparison of a wide range of mechanical properties between three commercially available biomaterials developed for PVP: two PMMA based materials, Osteopal V (Merck Biomaterial GMBH, Dermstedt, D) and Verterbroplastic (DePuy Acromed, Inc, MA, USA), and a Bis-GMA composite, Cortoss (Orthovita, PA, USA). Cortoss consistently exhibited higher values for compressive strength, bending modulus and shear strength to both Osteopal V and Vertebroplastic. The creep behaviour of Cortoss was also different from that of the two PMMA cements. PVP can take advantage from the development of new injectable biomaterials in response to the problems associated with the use of PMMA in a highly vascularised area such as the vertebral body. In addition careful modulation of the mechanical properties of the material has the potential to further improve the outcome of PVP, possibly reducing the risk of adjacent level fractures associated with the procedure

Topics
  • impedance spectroscopy
  • strength
  • composite
  • cement
  • viscosity
  • biomaterials
  • creep