Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Henriksen, Ulrik Birk

  • Google
  • 13
  • 37
  • 444

Technical University of Denmark

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (13/13 displayed)

  • 2023Influence of wood pellets properties on their grinding performance4citations
  • 2019From wood chips to pellets to milled pellets: The mechanical processing pathway of Austrian pine and European beech24citations
  • 2017Full-scale Milling Tests of Wood Pellets for Combustion in a Suspension-Fired Power Plant Boilercitations
  • 2016Closing the Loop - Utilization of Secondary Resources by Low Temperature Thermal Gasificationcitations
  • 2014Kinetic model for torrefaction of wood chips in a pilot-scale continuous reactor52citations
  • 2012Fuel Pellets from Wheat Straw: The Effect of Lignin Glass Transition and Surface Waxes on Pelletizing Properties115citations
  • 2011Pelletizing properties of torrefied spruce166citations
  • 2007High temperature electrolyte supported Ni-GDC/YSZ/LSM SOFC operation on two-stage Viking gasifier product gas83citations
  • 2005Termisk forgasning af biomassecitations
  • 2005Fundamentals of Biomass pellet productioncitations
  • 2004The Low Temperature CFB Gasifier:Latest 50 KW Test Results and New 500 KW Plantcitations
  • 2004The Low Temperature CFB Gasifiercitations
  • 2002The Low Temperature CFB Gasifier - Further Test Results and Possible Applicationscitations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Jensen, Peter Arendt
3 / 34 shared
Clausen, Sønnik
3 / 5 shared
Masche, Marvin
3 / 5 shared
Puig Arnavat, Maria
3 / 3 shared
Holm, Jens Kai
5 / 9 shared
Ahrenfeldt, Jesper
8 / 11 shared
Wadenbäck, Johan
1 / 2 shared
Hauggaard-Nielsen, Henrik
1 / 1 shared
Thomsen, Tobias Pape
1 / 5 shared
Bach, Lars Stougaard
1 / 1 shared
Stelte, Wolfgang
3 / 7 shared
Shang, Lei
2 / 4 shared
Clemons, Craig
2 / 3 shared
Sanadi, Anand R.
2 / 3 shared
Holm, Jens K.
2 / 2 shared
Fryda, L.
1 / 1 shared
Panopoulos, K. D.
1 / 1 shared
Ouweltjes, J. P.
1 / 2 shared
Hohenwarter, U.
1 / 1 shared
Schweiger, A.
1 / 2 shared
Bentzen, Jens Dall
1 / 1 shared
Hofmann, P.
1 / 3 shared
Kakaras, E.
1 / 1 shared
Hustad, Johan Einar
1 / 1 shared
Sørensen, Lasse Holst
1 / 1 shared
Sander, B.
3 / 7 shared
Richardt, K.
3 / 3 shared
Nielsen, Rasmus Glar
3 / 3 shared
Hansen, M. W.
2 / 2 shared
Stoholm, P.
3 / 3 shared
Gurbuz, S.
2 / 2 shared
Wolff, L.
3 / 3 shared
Brix, M.
2 / 2 shared
Qvale, Einar Bjørn
2 / 3 shared
Fock, Martin Wittrup
1 / 1 shared
Sarbæk, L.
1 / 1 shared
Tobiasen, L.
1 / 1 shared
Chart of publication period
2023
2019
2017
2016
2014
2012
2011
2007
2005
2004
2002

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Jensen, Peter Arendt
  • Clausen, Sønnik
  • Masche, Marvin
  • Puig Arnavat, Maria
  • Holm, Jens Kai
  • Ahrenfeldt, Jesper
  • Wadenbäck, Johan
  • Hauggaard-Nielsen, Henrik
  • Thomsen, Tobias Pape
  • Bach, Lars Stougaard
  • Stelte, Wolfgang
  • Shang, Lei
  • Clemons, Craig
  • Sanadi, Anand R.
  • Holm, Jens K.
  • Fryda, L.
  • Panopoulos, K. D.
  • Ouweltjes, J. P.
  • Hohenwarter, U.
  • Schweiger, A.
  • Bentzen, Jens Dall
  • Hofmann, P.
  • Kakaras, E.
  • Hustad, Johan Einar
  • Sørensen, Lasse Holst
  • Sander, B.
  • Richardt, K.
  • Nielsen, Rasmus Glar
  • Hansen, M. W.
  • Stoholm, P.
  • Gurbuz, S.
  • Wolff, L.
  • Brix, M.
  • Qvale, Einar Bjørn
  • Fock, Martin Wittrup
  • Sarbæk, L.
  • Tobiasen, L.
OrganizationsLocationPeople

thesis

Closing the Loop - Utilization of Secondary Resources by Low Temperature Thermal Gasification

  • Henriksen, Ulrik Birk
  • Hauggaard-Nielsen, Henrik
  • Holm, Jens Kai
  • Thomsen, Tobias Pape
  • Ahrenfeldt, Jesper
Abstract

This study addresses certain issues related to unsustainable management of secondary resources like organic waste, sewage sludge and residues from agriculture and industry with a focus on losses of nonfossil energy potential and valuable elements. In this context it is investigated how suitable application of low temperature thermal gasification could be applied to reduce the environmental impact of such management systems and increase the value and positive awareness of the resources in question.<br/>In the first part of this study, the Low Temperature Circulating Fluidized Bed (LT‐CFB gasifier) is described.The LT‐CFB gasifier is a technology originally developed for pre‐processing of biomass fuels like cereal straw. In popular terms, the LT‐CFB gasification process separates the inorganic and organic fractions of the straw. The majority of the inorganic material is extracted in one or several different ash fractions and the organic material is converted into a hot combustible gas product, which is subsequently combusted in an adjacent boiler. This substantially reduces the influence of the fuels inorganic composition on thecombustion properties. When combining LT‐CFB gasification with existing dust‐fired coal boilers, fossil fuels can be directly substituted with renewable fuels while reusing existing energy infrastructure. Currently, two operational LT‐CFB gasifiers exist: A pilot scale facility with a thermal capacity (TH) of 100 kW and a demonstration unit of 6 MWTH. Both units are involved in the present study. Many different fuels have previously been tested in LT‐CFB gasifiers and previous results from these experiments are described and evaluated with focus on the energy efficiency of the process and the quality of LT‐CFB ashes for use as fertilizers. The general benefits and drawbacks of low temperature gasification compared to anaerobic digestion and incineration are briefly discussed in this regard.<br/>Development and implementation of a method to screen for new fuel candidates for LT‐CFB gasification is conducted, and 22 new potential fuel candidates are characterized and compared to 4 previously proven LT‐CFB fuels. The investigated fuel candidates are categorized by their apparent suitability as LT‐CFB fuels and various positive characteristics as well as potentially problematic issues are discussed. The overall conclusion from the fuel screening is that in a Danish context it is highly relevant to consider low temperature gasification of especially sewage sludge and manure fibers while the international perspective includes especially sugarcane bagasse, various residues from olive oil production and rice husks. Only five fuel candidates are considered as potentially very problematic for single fuel LT‐CFB gasification: Fat separated from wastewater treatment, palm kernel shell residues, two animal meat and bone meal samples and wood pruning from Italian vineyards. The problems mainly relate to the proximate composition, ash sintering, char deposit formation and corrosion of steel surfaces during thermal tests. The fuel screening also includes a screening of P fertilizer quality of ashes and chars produced from thermal treatment of the different fuels, and significant differences were identified between the P fertilizer quality of ashes and chars. The fuel screening also involves an investigation of how analytically determined characteristics of three fuel mixes differ from the expected linear sum of the involved fuels’ individual characteristics. The results indicate profound possibilities for optimizing fuel and ash characteristics by fuel mixing with regard to ash deposit formation and sintering as well as ash and char P fertilizer quality.<br/>Of the 5 best candidates identified in the fuel screening, sewage sludge is found to be one of the most interesting as it is a locally as well as globally available resource with a large potential for optimized management compared to several of the currently applied management options. Proper management of sewage sludge holds a substantial potential for recovery of highly concentrated phosphorus (P) with good plant availability in ashes and chars from the thermal conversion. It is therefore decided to progress with sewage sludge in a series of experimental campaigns to provide a detailed investigation of potential benefits and problematic issues related to sewage sludge management by LT‐CFB gasification. Four experimental campaigns with gasification and co‐gasification of sewage sludge in LT‐CFB gasifiers are conducted and the results on process performance and the quality of the gas product are compared to results from other studies on thermal gasification of sludge. The overall conclusion is that many different gasifier designs have been proven successfully on sewage sludge fuels and LT‐CFB gasification is very well suited for gasification of sewage sludge as well as co‐gasification of sewage sludge and cereal straw. The LTCFB gasifier is fou...

Topics
  • impedance spectroscopy
  • surface
  • corrosion
  • experiment
  • steel
  • wood
  • sintering
  • gasification
  • Phosphorus