Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Cupi, Denisa

  • Google
  • 2
  • 10
  • 115

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (2/2 displayed)

  • 2016Regulatory Ecotoxicity Testing of Nanomaterials – Proposed Modifications of OECD Test Guidelines Based on Laboratory Experience with Silver and Titanium Dioxide nanoparticles.115citations
  • 2015Engineered Nanoparticle (Eco)Toxicitycitations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Schlich, Karstin
1 / 1 shared
Shaw, Benjamin
1 / 1 shared
Hund-Rinke, Kerstin
1 / 5 shared
Scott-Fordsmand, Janeck J.
1 / 5 shared
Fernandes, Teresa
1 / 2 shared
Handy, Richard
1 / 2 shared
Baun, Anders
2 / 12 shared
Navas, Jose M.
1 / 1 shared
Peijnenburg, Willie J. G. M.
1 / 3 shared
Hartmann, Nanna B.
1 / 4 shared
Chart of publication period
2016
2015

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Schlich, Karstin
  • Shaw, Benjamin
  • Hund-Rinke, Kerstin
  • Scott-Fordsmand, Janeck J.
  • Fernandes, Teresa
  • Handy, Richard
  • Baun, Anders
  • Navas, Jose M.
  • Peijnenburg, Willie J. G. M.
  • Hartmann, Nanna B.
OrganizationsLocationPeople

thesis

Engineered Nanoparticle (Eco)Toxicity

  • Hartmann, Nanna B.
  • Cupi, Denisa
  • Baun, Anders
Abstract

In the past decade, the use of nanotechnology has led to a large variety of products in the market, and is projected to markedly increase in value in the years to come. The use of manufactured nanomaterials comprises various technological and economic benefits due to their novel physico-chemical characteristics. It is these unique physico-chemical properties that have raised concerns during the last decade regarding the potential risk nanomaterials pose towards human health and the environment. Similar to other chemicals, nanomaterials have to be tested and ranked in order to obtain information on hazard identification, which is an integrated part of risk assessment. The complex nature and behavior of nanomaterials in the different environmental compartments and test systems has made it difficult for the scientific community to conduct robust and reproducible tests, and consequently, for regulatory bodies to take action. <br/>Standard test guidelines developed for conventional soluble chemicals, have been used to test nanomaterials. Concerns have been raised whether these test systems are adequate for addressing particle properties under different testing conditions and assessing toxicological outcomes. In fact, various international organizations (e.g. Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development and International Organization for Standardization) have recognized the need to amend and refine the current standard tests in relation to nanomaterials. Methodological considerations to standard testing for the purpose of testing engineered nanoparticles (ENPs) in aquatic system are a central theme in this thesis. The research presented herein has included acute tests with freshwater cladoceran Daphnia magna, genotoxicity tests with bacteria Salmonella typhimurium, as well as acellular and in vitro assays. <br/>An understanding of different physico-chemical properties and specific characteristics of various nanoparticles employed in this project has been attained by reviewing the literature in the field. Specific processes such as agglomeration in aquatic suspension, influence of environmental conditions on toxicity testing, dissolution, phototoxicity and inflammation were identified as important parameters and considered for further toxicity testing of Ag, ZnO, TiO2 and CeO2 ENPs; to investigate specific properties and improve test stability and reproducibility.<br/>The issue of agglomeration of ENPs in aqueous suspensions was investigated by attempting to prepare stable stock and test suspensions of various nanoparticles. A step-wise approach was presented to develop tailored dispersion protocols for (eco)toxicological testing of ENPs, based on the identification of critical issues and parameters for stock dispersion protocol development. This may serve as a basis for the development of a harmonized dispersion protocol for ENPs. Natural organic matter (NOM) and aging of suspensions prior to testing were employed in an attempt to stabilize aqueous suspensions of three different ENPs. While NOM helped in stabilizing ZnO ENPs suspensions, it caused agglomeration in TiO2 ENP stock suspensions and an underestimation of toxicity for Ag ENPs. Likewise, aging only aided in the stability of ZnO ENPs. It was concluded that NOM can mitigate or eliminate toxicity of Ag ENPs and is not recommended for use. The ratio of NOM to ENP proved to be important in stabilizing non-capped ENPs. Another attempt towards stable suspensions involved adjusting different standard testing parameters, such as the pH and ionic strength of the test media. It was found that point of zero charge measurements should be conducted prior to ecotoxicological studies. Testing media of very low ionic strength at a pH where the ENPs have the lowest agglomerate size should be employed. This will control agglomeration and increase the stability and reproducibility of the test results. For ENPs such as TiO2, toxicity of smaller agglomerates was significantly higher than larger agglomerates, highlighting the importance of size distribution in relation to toxicity. It was recognized that it is difficult to give general advice that is applicable for testing all nanomaterials, thus, a case-by-case evaluation should be conducted.<br/>Another topic in this thesis was to evaluate the feasibility of current methods to screen and rank toxicity of ENPs in a high-throughput manner. Investigation of TiO2 phototoxicity using the umu assay revealed that UV light caused damage to the bacteria and that high ENP concentrations had a shading effect, which were categorized as confounding factors. Similarly, an attempt to measure inflammation response caused by CeO2 and TiO2 ENPs, revealed that the high surface area of ENPs has a high affinity and binding capacity for protein molecules/assay reagents. These artifacts questioned the feasibility of these assays for testing ENPs. The influence of test parameters and confounding factors/artifacts should be taken i...

Topics
  • nanoparticle
  • impedance spectroscopy
  • dispersion
  • surface
  • strength
  • aging
  • toxicity
  • aging