Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Hansen, Steffen Foss

  • Google
  • 8
  • 30
  • 360

Technical University of Denmark

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (8/8 displayed)

  • 2023Smart materials and safe and sustainable-by-design - a feasibility and policy analysiscitations
  • 2016Aquatic toxicity testing for hazard identification of engineered nanoparticlescitations
  • 2016Quantification of dermal exposure to nanoparticles from solid nanocomposites by using single particle ICP-MScitations
  • 2016Release of nanomaterials from solid nanocomposites and consumer exposure assessment - a forward-looking review57citations
  • 2016Meeting the Needs for Released Nanomaterials Required for Further Testing—The SUN Approach58citations
  • 2016EU Regulation of Nanobiocides: Challenges in Implementing the Biocidal Product Regulation (BPR)48citations
  • 2008Uncertainty and Sensitivity Analysis of Environmental and Health Risks of Nanomaterialscitations
  • 2007Categorization framework to aid hazard identification of nanomaterials197citations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Paulsen, Freja
1 / 1 shared
Trier, Xenia
1 / 4 shared
Sørensen, Sara Nørgaard
1 / 1 shared
Baun, Anders
4 / 12 shared
Lützhøft, Hans-Christian Holten
1 / 1 shared
Mackevica, Aiga
3 / 7 shared
Olsson, Mikael Emil
1 / 1 shared
Neubauer, Nicole
1 / 4 shared
Wyrwoll, Anne
1 / 1 shared
Hristozov, Danail
1 / 4 shared
Scifo, Lorette
1 / 7 shared
Boldrin, Alessio
1 / 2 shared
Kammer, Frank Von Der
1 / 3 shared
Navratilova, Jana
1 / 4 shared
Rose, Jerome
1 / 5 shared
Caballero, Alejandro
1 / 1 shared
Heggelund, Laura Roverskov
1 / 1 shared
Hennig, Michael
1 / 1 shared
Peters, Ruud
1 / 1 shared
Gottschalk, Fadri
1 / 1 shared
Leeuwen, Stefan Van
1 / 1 shared
Wohlleben, Wendel
1 / 25 shared
Nowack, Bernd
1 / 4 shared
Schäffer, Andreas
1 / 7 shared
Maes, Hanna
1 / 1 shared
Brinch, Anna
1 / 1 shared
Hartmann, Nanna B.
1 / 4 shared
Grieger, Khara Deanne
1 / 1 shared
Olsen, Stig Irving
1 / 7 shared
Larsen, Britt Hvolbæk
1 / 1 shared
Chart of publication period
2023
2016
2008
2007

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Paulsen, Freja
  • Trier, Xenia
  • Sørensen, Sara Nørgaard
  • Baun, Anders
  • Lützhøft, Hans-Christian Holten
  • Mackevica, Aiga
  • Olsson, Mikael Emil
  • Neubauer, Nicole
  • Wyrwoll, Anne
  • Hristozov, Danail
  • Scifo, Lorette
  • Boldrin, Alessio
  • Kammer, Frank Von Der
  • Navratilova, Jana
  • Rose, Jerome
  • Caballero, Alejandro
  • Heggelund, Laura Roverskov
  • Hennig, Michael
  • Peters, Ruud
  • Gottschalk, Fadri
  • Leeuwen, Stefan Van
  • Wohlleben, Wendel
  • Nowack, Bernd
  • Schäffer, Andreas
  • Maes, Hanna
  • Brinch, Anna
  • Hartmann, Nanna B.
  • Grieger, Khara Deanne
  • Olsen, Stig Irving
  • Larsen, Britt Hvolbæk
OrganizationsLocationPeople

thesis

Aquatic toxicity testing for hazard identification of engineered nanoparticles

  • Hansen, Steffen Foss
  • Sørensen, Sara Nørgaard
  • Baun, Anders
  • Lützhøft, Hans-Christian Holten
Abstract

Within the last few decades, major advances in the field of nanotechnology have enabled production of engineered nanoparticles (ENPs) for various applications and consumer products already available on the market. ENPs may exhibit unique and novel properties compared to their bulk counterparts, which is often related to a high surface-to-volume ratio. These properties have also caused concern amongst scientists and regulators, who have called for timely identification of the potential adverse effects of ENPs to human health and the environment.Despite intensive research on the aquatic toxicity of ENPs, the applicability of the generated data for hazard identification purposes is generally impaired by poor reproducibility and reliability of data, and limited understanding of the underlying effect mechanisms. Consequently, it has been questioned whether the standardized aquatic toxicity tests, developed for testing soluble compounds, are equally applicable for ENPs. The preconditions for aquatic toxicity tests include aqueous solubility of the chemical test compound and stability during incubation. These criteria are not met for ENPs, as they are suspended rather than dissolved in aqueous media. Moreover, ENPs undergo time-dependent transformation processes of agglomeration, dissolution, sedimentation, and interactions with organisms and their exudates. Together, these processes challenge the establishment of traditional concentration-response data by affecting both the exposure and the response axes.The actual exposure experienced by organisms may not be reflected by the ENPconcentration in medium, commonly applied as the exposure metric, and the responses of organisms may result from various toxic and non-toxic mechanisms occurring simultaneously.<br/>In this thesis, the challenges related to exposure control and response mechanisms in aquatic toxicity tests with ENPs are addressed through: 1) Exposure timing measures to minimize the transformation processes of ENPs during test incubation, and 2) Multi-dimensional approaches including investigations of other organisms responses than the traditionally applied, and determination of different exposure fractions such as the concentration of dissolved ions from ENPs and body burdens.Although these approaches are scientifically exploratory by nature, the aim is to generate data applicable for regulatory hazard identification of ENPs. The focus has been on the algal growth rate inhibition test and acute and chronic toxicity tests with crustaceans, all commonly applied in a regulatory context.<br/>The exposure timing measures included aging of ENPs in test media prior to incubation, and/or shortened exposure duration. For algae, shorter exposure duration was obtained through the application of an acute 2h 14C-assimilation test. For daphnids, a short-term (1-3h) pulse exposure was applied, followed by transfer of the organisms to pure medium, where acute and chronic effects were monitored according to standard guidelines during 48h and 21 days respectively. These approaches assisted to minimize the ENP transformation during incubation, but also influenced the toxicity. While aging of ENPs may both increase and decrease toxicity, the shortened exposure mainly appeared to involve a risk of underestimating, or in worst case overlooking chronic effects in algae and daphnids. Thus, more sensitive endpoints may be relevant for algal tests with shortened exposure, such as oxidative stress, found to occur within few hours’ exposure to certain ENPs.The traditional endpoints of algal growth rate inhibition and daphnia immobility were found to be confounded by physical effects. As examples, the algal growth rate can be inhibited by ENPs physically obstructing the light available to the algae (shading), and the immobility of daphnids may partly result from ENPs adsorbed to these organisms’ exterior. In addition to different effect mechanisms, several exposure fractions are available to interact with the organisms, including ENPs adsorbed to or internalized into the organisms/cells, suspended ENPs and ions dissolved from the ENPs. Together, these various exposure fractions and the multiple effect mechanisms complicate the establishment of traditional concentration-response relationships that are based on a single response and exposure dose-metric.A multi-dimensional approach is therefore suggested for aquatic toxicity testing of ENPs for hazard identification purposes. This includes investigation of both physical and cellular effects in organisms in addition to the traditional endpoints. Also, the different exposure fractions of ENPs should be considered including the adsorbed and internalized fractions in organisms, as well as the dissolved and total concentrations in the medium. In practice it is neither unambiguous nor straightforward to determine the different exposure fractions and effect mechanisms, thus some consensus on the best available practices would be ...

Topics
  • nanoparticle
  • impedance spectroscopy
  • surface
  • compound
  • aging
  • toxicity
  • aging