People | Locations | Statistics |
---|---|---|
Naji, M. |
| |
Motta, Antonella |
| |
Aletan, Dirar |
| |
Mohamed, Tarek |
| |
Ertürk, Emre |
| |
Taccardi, Nicola |
| |
Kononenko, Denys |
| |
Petrov, R. H. | Madrid |
|
Alshaaer, Mazen | Brussels |
|
Bih, L. |
| |
Casati, R. |
| |
Muller, Hermance |
| |
Kočí, Jan | Prague |
|
Šuljagić, Marija |
| |
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-Artemi | Brussels |
|
Azam, Siraj |
| |
Ospanova, Alyiya |
| |
Blanpain, Bart |
| |
Ali, M. A. |
| |
Popa, V. |
| |
Rančić, M. |
| |
Ollier, Nadège |
| |
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro |
| |
Landes, Michael |
| |
Rignanese, Gian-Marco |
|
Ottosen, Lisbeth M.
in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%
Topics
Publications (34/34 displayed)
- 2024Microcracks assessment during unloading for structural elements reuse
- 2024Rheological characterization of temperature-sensitive biopolymer-bound 3D printing concretecitations
- 2024Mechanical properties of mortar substituting fine aggregate with wood bottom ash from fluidized bed boilers
- 2024Screening of natural polymers as binder in concrete compositescitations
- 2023Clay Brick Powder as Partial Cement Replacementcitations
- 2023Possible Applications for Waste Fishing Nets in Construction Materialcitations
- 2022Utilization of acid-washed sewage sludge ash as sand or cement replacement in concretecitations
- 2021Recovering rare earth elements from contaminated soils: Critical overview of current remediation technologiescitations
- 2020Selecting Electrode Materials and Sequence for Electrochemical Removal of Chlorinated Ethenes in Groundwatercitations
- 2019Characterization of sewage sludge ash and its effect on moisture physics of mortarcitations
- 2019Adobe specimens of Greenlandic fine-grained rock material
- 2019Electrodialytically treated MSWI fly ash use in clay bricks
- 2019Challenges in electrochemical remediation of chlorinated solvents in natural groundwater aquifer settingscitations
- 2018Selenium removal from petroleum refinery wastewater using an electrocoagulation techniquecitations
- 2017The influence of sediment properties and experimental variables on the efficiency of electrodialytic removal of metals from sedimentcitations
- 2017Colour, compressive strength and workability of mortars with an iron rich sewage sludge ashcitations
- 2016Degradation of oil products in a soil from a Russian Barents hot-spot during electrodialytic remediationcitations
- 2016Wood ash used as partly sand and/or cement replacement in mortarcitations
- 2016The necessity of recovering soluble phosphorus from sewage sludge ashes before use in concrete based on concrete setting and workabilitycitations
- 2016Replacement of 5% of OPC by fly ash and APC residues from MSWI with electrodialytic pre-treatment
- 2015Comparison of 2-compartment, 3-compartment and stack designs for electrodialytic removal of heavy metals from harbour sedimentscitations
- 2015Screening of variable importance for optimizing electrodialytic remediation of heavy metals from polluted harbour sedimentscitations
- 2015Ammonium citrate as enhancement for electrodialytic soil remediation and investigation of soil solution during the processcitations
- 2015Multivariate methods for evaluating the efficiency of electrodialytic removal of heavy metals from polluted harbour sedimentscitations
- 2014The Aesthetical quality of SSA-containing mortar and concrete
- 2013Effect of pulse current on acidification and removal of Cu, Cd, and As during suspended electrodialytic soil remediationcitations
- 2012Electrodialytic remediation of suspended soil – Comparison of two different soil fractionscitations
- 2010Numerical Simulations of Electrokinetic Processes Comparing the Use of a Constant Voltage Difference or a Constant Current as Driving Force
- 2009Electrodialytic remediation of harbour sediment in suspension - Evaluation of effects induced by changes in stirring velocity and current density on heavy metal removal and pHcitations
- 2007Electrodialytic extraction of Cd and Cu from sediment from Sisimiut Harbour, Greenlandcitations
- 2006Comparison of electrodialytic removal of Cu from spiked kaolinite, spiked soil and industrially polluted soil
- 2005Acidification of Harbour sediment and removal of heavy metals induced by water splitting in electrodialytic remediation.citations
- 2005Salt Induced Decay of Masonry and Electrokinetic Repair
- 2000Electrodialytic removal of Cu, Cr, and As from chromated copper arsenate-treated timber wastecitations
Places of action
Organizations | Location | People |
---|
document
Salt Induced Decay of Masonry and Electrokinetic Repair
Abstract
Salt induced decay of bricks is caused when salts exert internal pressures, which exceed the strength of the stone. The presence of aqueous electrolyte solutions in the capillary pores of brick materials can under changing climate conditions cause deterioration of wall structures. Ions move in brick depending on its water content and salts may be precipitated on the outer wall or concentrated under paint layers covering the surface of the brick. Different types of damage may appear in masonry walls due to these concentrating phenomena. Bricks themselves can be destroyed and the mortar can, too. If the masonry is covered with paint, the precipitating salts can affect the adhesion of the paint negatively. Furthermore the presence of the salts will increase the hygroscopic moisture content of the masonry meaning that the masonry will have a relatively high water content compared to a wall without increased salt content. The types and concentrations of salts found in relation to building stone vary greatly and depend on the stone type and the environment around the building. In general most common salts are sulphates, chlorides and nitrates. These include CaSO4, Na2SO4, MgSO4,KCl and KNO3.At present no method exists that can effectively remove salts from masonry. Some methods based on diffusion of ions into an external layer attached to the wall but it is a very slow process. In the present study it is investigated if electromigration can be used as transport process to remove the salt ions from brick masonry and also how much the removal rate can be increased by application of the electric field compared to diffusion alone. Some main differences occur between electrokinetic remediation of heavy metal polluted soil and electrokinetic removal of salts from brick masonry. The ions of interest in the brick are not adsorbed to a high extent, as it is often the case with heavy metals in soils. Bricks are made from baked clay, however during the baking process the cation exchange capacity of the clay is strongly decreased which affect the electric conductivity. The electric conductivity of bricks without increased salt content is very low compared to soils in general. Furthermore in a masonry wall there are boundaries with different chemistry (e.g. pH) that the ions must pass, brick-mortar boundaries.From initial experiments with electrokinetic removal of Ca2+ ions from bricks good results have been found. The bricks were spiked with Ca(NO3)2 to the brick before the current was applied and it was found that the Ca content of the brick after electrokinetic treatment was even lower than it was originally before the spiking. A series of different duration was conducted and it was evident that the Ca content decreased as the duration increased. More experimental series are now in progress where the mobility of other both cations and anions are compared. Furthermore the relation between removal rate and current density are studied.