People | Locations | Statistics |
---|---|---|
Naji, M. |
| |
Motta, Antonella |
| |
Aletan, Dirar |
| |
Mohamed, Tarek |
| |
Ertürk, Emre |
| |
Taccardi, Nicola |
| |
Kononenko, Denys |
| |
Petrov, R. H. | Madrid |
|
Alshaaer, Mazen | Brussels |
|
Bih, L. |
| |
Casati, R. |
| |
Muller, Hermance |
| |
Kočí, Jan | Prague |
|
Šuljagić, Marija |
| |
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-Artemi | Brussels |
|
Azam, Siraj |
| |
Ospanova, Alyiya |
| |
Blanpain, Bart |
| |
Ali, M. A. |
| |
Popa, V. |
| |
Rančić, M. |
| |
Ollier, Nadège |
| |
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro |
| |
Landes, Michael |
| |
Rignanese, Gian-Marco |
|
Olsen, Stig Irving
Technical University of Denmark
in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%
Topics
Publications (7/7 displayed)
- 2024LCA and LCC of wire arc additively manufactured and repaired parts compared to conventional fabrication techniquescitations
- 2016Circular economy: To be or not to be in a closed product loop? A Life Cycle Assessment of aluminium cans with inclusion of alloying elementscitations
- 2016Challenges in LCA modelling of multiple loops for aluminium cans
- 2015The Hamlet dilemma for aluminium cans in the circular economy: to be or not to be in a closed loop
- 2010Environmental benefits from reusing clothescitations
- 2010Ecoefficiency indicators for development of nano-composites
- 2007Categorization framework to aid hazard identification of nanomaterialscitations
Places of action
Organizations | Location | People |
---|
conferencepaper
Ecoefficiency indicators for development of nano-composites
Abstract
The EU FP7 funded project “NanCore” aims to develop foam nano composites. One WP addresses the environmental aspects using Life Cycle Assessments. A preliminary assessment, based on literature sources, aims to provide inputs for the further technology development in terms of eco-indicators. Four nanocomposites (5 wt%-nanofiller) were investigated; PU/CNT (in-situ polymerization), PP/CNT (in-situ polymerization), PU/clay (bulk polymerization), and PP/clay nanocomposites (bulk polymerization). Due to of lack of information, only the material stages (extraction of materials) and the production of the nanocomposites were evaluated, i.e. so-called “cradle to gate” assessment. Overall, the study emphasises the CNT production as a main cause of impact. Variations occur depending on the type of technology considered (HiPco, FBCVD). However, acid production (for purification process), electricity production, and production of catalysts are identified as main contributors to the impacts. Regarding nano clay the main contributors to impacts on environment are the foaming process as well as the production of the reactants and the catalysts (e.g. polyol, propylene). Nano clay does not contribute significantly. Eco-indicators thus high-light the CNT production, but also foaming processes etc. as focus areas for further technology development. Potential release of nano particles during the life cycle is also a particular issue to devote consideration.