| People | Locations | Statistics |
|---|---|---|
| Naji, M. |
| |
| Motta, Antonella |
| |
| Aletan, Dirar |
| |
| Mohamed, Tarek |
| |
| Ertürk, Emre |
| |
| Taccardi, Nicola |
| |
| Kononenko, Denys |
| |
| Petrov, R. H. | Madrid |
|
| Alshaaer, Mazen | Brussels |
|
| Bih, L. |
| |
| Casati, R. |
| |
| Muller, Hermance |
| |
| Kočí, Jan | Prague |
|
| Šuljagić, Marija |
| |
| Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-Artemi | Brussels |
|
| Azam, Siraj |
| |
| Ospanova, Alyiya |
| |
| Blanpain, Bart |
| |
| Ali, M. A. |
| |
| Popa, V. |
| |
| Rančić, M. |
| |
| Ollier, Nadège |
| |
| Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro |
| |
| Landes, Michael |
| |
| Rignanese, Gian-Marco |
|
Mischkot, Michael
in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%
Topics
Publications (9/9 displayed)
- 2019Value chain and production cost optimization by integrating additive manufacturing in injection molding process chaincitations
- 2018A Soft Tooling Process Chain for Injection Molding of a 3D Component with Micro Pillarscitations
- 2017Performance Simulation and Verification of Vat Photopolymerization Based, Additively Manufactured Injection Molding Inserts with Micro-Featurescitations
- 2017Performance Simulation and Verification of Vat Photopolymerization Based, Additively Manufactured Injection Molding Inserts with Micro-Featurescitations
- 2017Integration of Fiber-Reinforced Polymers in a Life Cycle Assessment of Injection Molding Process Chains with Additive Manufacturingcitations
- 2017Dimensional accuracy of Acrylonitrile Butadiene Styrene injection molded parts produced in a pilot produc
- 2016Comparison of conventional Injection Mould Inserts to Additively Manufactured Inserts using Life Cycle Assessment
- 2015Application of Functional Nano-Patterning to Polymer Medical Micro Implantscitations
- 2015Application of Functional Nano-Patterning to Polymer Medical Micro Implantscitations
Places of action
| Organizations | Location | People |
|---|
document
Comparison of conventional Injection Mould Inserts to Additively Manufactured Inserts using Life Cycle Assessment
Abstract
Polymer Additive Manufacturing can be used to produce soft tooling inserts for injection moulding. Compared to conventional tooling, the energy and time consumption during production are significantly lower. As the life time of such inserts is significantly shorter than the life time of traditional brass, aluminium, or steel inserts, multiple inserts might be needed to produce a large number of parts.<br/>In an ongoing study, a simplified Life Cycle Assessment has been carried out in order to provide information on how the four alternative insert materials perform in comparison in terms of their potential environmental impact and yield throughout the development and pilot phase. Insert geometry is particularly advantageous for pilot production and small production sizes.<br/>In this research, Life Cycle Assessment is used to compare the environmental impact of soft tooling by Additive Manufacturing (using Digital Light Processing) and three traditional methods for the manufacture of inserts (milling of brass, steel, and aluminium) for injection moulds during the pre-production phase.