Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Pegg, Elise Catherine

  • Google
  • 11
  • 21
  • 43

University of Bath

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (11/11 displayed)

  • 2024Auxetic fixation devices can achieve superior pullout performances compared to standard fixation concepts3citations
  • 2023A Feasibility Study for Additively Manufactured Composite Toolingcitations
  • 2023Additively manufactured cure tools for composites manufacture2citations
  • 2017Effect of absorbed fatty acids on physical properties of ultra-high molecular weight polyethylenecitations
  • 2017Use of contrast agents on polymeric materialscitations
  • 2016Elasto-plastic Material Models Introduce Error in Finite Element Polyethylene Wear Predictionscitations
  • 2016A Python Package to Assign Material Properties of Bone to Finite Element Models from within Abaqus Softwarecitations
  • 2016An open source software tool to assign the material properties of bone for ABAQUS finite element simulations24citations
  • 2015Tibial Fracture after Unicompartmental Knee Replacement: The Importance of Surgical Cut Accuracycitations
  • 20133D positioning of ACL attachment sites during flexioncitations
  • 2013Fracture of mobile unicompartmental knee bearings14citations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Barnett, Elinor
1 / 1 shared
Gill, H. S.
7 / 18 shared
Fletcher, James
1 / 1 shared
Loukaides, Evripides G.
1 / 9 shared
Kratz, James
2 / 46 shared
Dhokia, Vimal
2 / 29 shared
Maes, Vincent Karel
1 / 7 shared
Valero, Maria D. R.
2 / 2 shared
Radhakrishnan, Arjun
2 / 8 shared
Valentine, Max D. A.
2 / 3 shared
Maes, Vincent K.
1 / 3 shared
Zaribaf, Parnian Hossein Zadeh
2 / 2 shared
Alotta, Gioacchino
1 / 3 shared
Barrera, Olga
1 / 3 shared
Pandit, Hemant
1 / 3 shared
Murray, David
2 / 2 shared
Alinejad, Mona
1 / 1 shared
Oconnor, Jj
1 / 1 shared
Murray, David W.
1 / 1 shared
Pandit, Hemant G.
1 / 1 shared
Oconnor, John J.
1 / 1 shared
Chart of publication period
2024
2023
2017
2016
2015
2013

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Barnett, Elinor
  • Gill, H. S.
  • Fletcher, James
  • Loukaides, Evripides G.
  • Kratz, James
  • Dhokia, Vimal
  • Maes, Vincent Karel
  • Valero, Maria D. R.
  • Radhakrishnan, Arjun
  • Valentine, Max D. A.
  • Maes, Vincent K.
  • Zaribaf, Parnian Hossein Zadeh
  • Alotta, Gioacchino
  • Barrera, Olga
  • Pandit, Hemant
  • Murray, David
  • Alinejad, Mona
  • Oconnor, Jj
  • Murray, David W.
  • Pandit, Hemant G.
  • Oconnor, John J.
OrganizationsLocationPeople

document

Elasto-plastic Material Models Introduce Error in Finite Element Polyethylene Wear Predictions

  • Alotta, Gioacchino
  • Pegg, Elise Catherine
  • Barrera, Olga
Abstract

<b>Introduction: </b>Polyethylene wear of joint replacements can cause severe clinical complications, including; osteolysis, implant loosening, inflammation and pain. Wear simulator testing is often used to assess new designs, but it is expensive and time consuming.It is possible to predict the volume of polyethylene implant wear from finite element models using a modification of Archard's classic wear law [1-2]. Typically, linear elastic isotropic, or elasto-plastic material models are used to represent the polyethylene. The purpose of this study was to investigate whether use of a viscoelastic material model would significantly alter the predicted volumetric wear of a mobile-bearing unicompartmental knee replacement. <b><br/></b><b>Materials &amp; Methods: </b>Tensile creep-recovery experiments were performed to characterise the creep and relaxation behaviour of the polyethylene (moulded GUR 4150 samples machined to 180x20x1 mm). Samples were loaded to 3 MPa stress in 4 minutes, and then held for 6 hours, the tensile stress was removed and samples were left to relax for 6 hours.The mechanical test data was used fit to a validated three--dimensional fractional Maxwell viscoelastic constitutive material model [3].An explicit finite element model of a mobile--bearing unicompartmental knee replacement was created, which has been described previously [4].The medial knee replacement was loaded to 1200 N over a period of 0.2 s.The bearing was meshed using quadratic tetrahedral elements (1.5 mm seeding size based on results of a mesh convergence study), and the femoral component was represented as an analytical rigid body.Wear predictions were made from the contact stress and sliding distance using Archard's law, as has been described in the literature [1-2]. A wear factor of 5.24x10-11 was used based upon the work by Netter et al. [2].All models were created and solved using ABAQUS finite element software (version 6.14, Simulia, Dassault Systemes).<b><br/></b><b>Results: </b>The fractional viscoelastic material model predicted almost twice as much wear (0.119 mm3/million cycles) compared to the elasto-plastic model (0.069 mm3/million cycles).The higher wear prediction was due to both an increased sliding distance and higher contact pressures in the viscoelastic model. <br/><b>Discussion: </b>These preliminary findings indicate the simplified elasto-plastic polyethylene material representation can underestimate wear predictions from numerical simulations.Polyethylene is known to be a viscoelastic material which undergoes creep clinically, and it is not surprising that it is necessary to represent that viscoelastic behaviour to accurately predict implant wear.However, it does increase the complexity and run time of such computational studies, which may be prohibitive.<b><br/></b><b>References: </b>[1] Maxian, T. A. et al. “A sliding--distance--coupled finite element formulation for polyethylene wear in total hip arthroplasty. ” (1996) J Biomech 29, p687-692. [2] Netter, J. et al. “Prediction of wear in crosslinked polyethylene unicompartmental knee arthroplasty” (2015) Lubricants 3 p381-393. [3] Alotta, G., et al. “On the behaviour of a three-dimensional fractional viscoelastic constitutive model” Manuscript submitted to Meccanica (2016). [4] Pegg, E.C. et al. “Fracture of mobile unicompartmental knee bearings: A parametric finite element study”. (2013) Proc ImechE Part H: Journal of Engineering in Medicine 227 p1213-1223.

Topics
  • impedance spectroscopy
  • polymer
  • experiment
  • simulation
  • isotropic
  • hot isostatic pressing
  • creep