Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Riches, Philip

  • Google
  • 7
  • 21
  • 15

University of Strathclyde

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (7/7 displayed)

  • 2023Characterisation of native and decellularised porcine tendon under tension and compression2citations
  • 2023A chaos-inspired biomechanical biomarker of ankle instabilitycitations
  • 2016Paradoxical size effects in composite laminates and other heterogeneous materials1citations
  • 2015The effects of decellularisation on the mechanical properties of bone, and subsequent recellularisation of the samples.citations
  • 2014Characterisation and Validation of Sawbones™ Artificial Composite Femur materialcitations
  • 2013On the Poisson's ratio of the nucleus pulposus11citations
  • 2012Assessment of forces imparted on seating systems by children with special needs during daily living activities1citations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Fermor, Hazel L.
1 / 1 shared
Edwards, Jennifer H.
1 / 1 shared
Solis-Cordova, Jacqueline
1 / 1 shared
Herbert, Anthony
1 / 1 shared
Brockett, Claire L.
1 / 1 shared
Forsyth, Lauren
1 / 2 shared
Mulder, Kim
1 / 1 shared
Hickey, Matthew
1 / 1 shared
Fleming, Grace
1 / 1 shared
Ligeti, Alexandra
1 / 1 shared
Frame, Jamie C.
1 / 1 shared
Wheel, Marcus
2 / 2 shared
Grant, Mary
1 / 2 shared
Mohamad, M. Mohd Riduan Bin
1 / 1 shared
Young, A. M.
1 / 2 shared
Gilroy, Daniel
1 / 1 shared
Phillips, A.
1 / 3 shared
Farrell, Mark
1 / 2 shared
Green, Peter
1 / 1 shared
Lees, Karl
1 / 1 shared
Samaneein, Katika
1 / 1 shared
Chart of publication period
2023
2016
2015
2014
2013
2012

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Fermor, Hazel L.
  • Edwards, Jennifer H.
  • Solis-Cordova, Jacqueline
  • Herbert, Anthony
  • Brockett, Claire L.
  • Forsyth, Lauren
  • Mulder, Kim
  • Hickey, Matthew
  • Fleming, Grace
  • Ligeti, Alexandra
  • Frame, Jamie C.
  • Wheel, Marcus
  • Grant, Mary
  • Mohamad, M. Mohd Riduan Bin
  • Young, A. M.
  • Gilroy, Daniel
  • Phillips, A.
  • Farrell, Mark
  • Green, Peter
  • Lees, Karl
  • Samaneein, Katika
OrganizationsLocationPeople

document

The effects of decellularisation on the mechanical properties of bone, and subsequent recellularisation of the samples.

  • Riches, Philip
  • Grant, Mary
  • Mohamad, M. Mohd Riduan Bin
Abstract

Regenerative medicine strategies involving decellularised extracellular matrix scaffolds are developing fast and, in particular, decellularized bone has been proposed for bone tissue engineering. This study aimed to establish decellularisation and recellularisation protocols and to measure the Young’s modulus and pore size of the decellularised trabecular bone samples. Twelve bovine cancellous proximal femur samples (7mm x 7mm x 2mm) were decellularised by six cycles of overnight incubation at 37<sup>°</sup>C using two protocols: A – 10mM Tris, 1mM EDTA, 0.1% v/v Triton X-100 and B – method A plus 0.5% w/v trypsin. Decellularisation was confirmed by the absence of DNA staining with DAPI both by detecting any DNA remaining on the bone matrix spectrofluorometrically, and by microscopic examination. Young's modulus was determined before and after incubation through compression testing at 1 mm/s up to 400N (8.16MPa). The porosity of the bone samples before and after decellularisation was measured using a mercury porosimeter. Recellularisation using HOS cells (seeded at 5x10<sup>5</sup> cells per cm<sup>2</sup>bone) progressed for up to 3 weeks in DMEM supplemented with L-ascorbic acid, β-glycerophosphate, dexamethasone, FCS, PEST, and NEAA. Bone samples were placed onto non-adherent dishes and adherent dishes. The extent of recellularisation was compared in static and dynamic culture conditions using a roller incubator set at 15 rpm to effect dynamic conditions. DAPI staining revealed that protocol B removed all measurable DNA from the bone samples (Figure 1). Decellularisation did not affect Young’s modulus (Figure 2). Pore diameters did not differ with decellularisation and were in the ideal range for cell growth. Mean ALP activity (Figure 3A) and MTT reduction (Figure 3C) was greater on the adherent surface than on non-adherent surface albeit non-significantly. There was no significant difference between static and dynamic conditions in ALP activities between 3 and 7 days (Figure 3B). Data suggests that cells proliferated more readily when samples were placed in adherent dishes (Figure 3D). This work has established appropriate protocols to make donor bone scaffolds with appropriate porosity to allow reseeding with human bone cells.These could be used to repair bone defects in recipient patients.

Topics
  • pore
  • surface
  • porosity
  • Mercury