Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Sezinando, Ana

  • Google
  • 4
  • 7
  • 114

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (4/4 displayed)

  • 2014Immediate adhesive properties to dentin and enamel of a universal adhesive associated with a hydrophobic resin coat83citations
  • 2012Dentin bond strengths of four adhesion strategies after thermal fatigue and 6-month water storage31citations
  • 2011Microtensile bond strengths and interfacial examination of a polyalkenoate-based 1-step adhesivecitations
  • 2011Bonding ability of three ethanol-based adhesives after thermal fatiguecitations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Muñoz, Miguel A.
1 / 4 shared
Luque-Martinez, Issis V.
1 / 1 shared
Staichak, Rodrigo
1 / 1 shared
Reis, Alessandra
1 / 4 shared
Loguercio, Alessandro D.
1 / 4 shared
Regalheiro, Rita
1 / 1 shared
Gomes, George
2 / 11 shared
Chart of publication period
2014
2012
2011

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Muñoz, Miguel A.
  • Luque-Martinez, Issis V.
  • Staichak, Rodrigo
  • Reis, Alessandra
  • Loguercio, Alessandro D.
  • Regalheiro, Rita
  • Gomes, George
OrganizationsLocationPeople

article

Bonding ability of three ethanol-based adhesives after thermal fatigue

  • Gomes, George
  • Sezinando, Ana
Abstract

<p>Purpose: To study the effect of thermal fatigue on the μTBS and interfacial morphology of three ethanolbased etch-&amp;-rinse 2-bottle adhesives. Methods: μTBS - 24 third molars were randomly assigned to one of three adhesive systems: (1) Adper Single Bond Plus (SBP, 3M ESPE); (2) Ambar (AMB, FGM); (3) Excite (EXC, Ivoclar Vivadent), and restored with a hybrid resin composite. For each adhesive, half of the specimens were thermocycled (TC) for 20,000 cycles (5-55°C) while the other half was kept in distilled water for 24 hours at 37°C (control). Specimens were sectioned in X and Y directions and the resulting sticks were tested to failure in tension mode at a crosshead speed of 1 mm/minute. Statistical analysis was computed using ANOVA and Tukey's post hoc for the μTBS; and non-parametric cross-tabulation with Chi-Square for the pre-testing failures at P&lt; 0.05. Interfacial morphology - The occlusal enamel was removed from 12 extracted molars perpendicular to the long axis of the tooth. Teeth were equally assigned to one of the three adhesives and restored with a 1 mm-thick layer of a hybrid composite resin. A 2 mm-thick disk was sectioned from each specimen and cross-sectioned in two identical halves. Half of the each specimen was TC for 20,000 cycles (5-55°C) while the other half was kept in distilled water for 24 hours at 37°C (control). Specimens were chemically challenged and prepared for FESEM observation to observe the integrity of the hybrid layer before and after thermal fatigue. Micrographs were recorded digitally at standard magnifications and measurements were taken with the microscope embedded image software. Results: μTBS - SBP and AMB resulted in statistically similar mean μTBS regardless of thermal fatigue. EXC resulted in statistically lower mean μTBS than SBP and AMB for the control (P&lt; 0.001) and for the TC specimens (P&lt; 0.0001). Interfacial morphology - The hybrid layers of SBP and AMB were densely infiltrated without interfacial failure. For EXC, extensive areas of debonding were observed between the adhesive layer and the hybrid layer both for the control and the TC groups. Thermal fatigue did not influence the bonding ability of AMB and SBP, but was detrimental for EXC.</p>

Topics
  • morphology
  • fatigue
  • composite
  • interfacial
  • resin