Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Čtyroký, Jiří

  • Google
  • 2
  • 11
  • 8

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (2/2 displayed)

  • 2015Simulations of waveguide Bragg grating filters based on subwavelength grating waveguidecitations
  • 2007Fabrication and characterization of channel optical waveguides in Er/Yb-doped silicate glasses8citations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Richter, Ivan
1 / 2 shared
Kwiecien, Pavel
1 / 1 shared
Chen, Lawrence R.
1 / 1 shared
Wang, Junjia
1 / 3 shared
Glesk, Ivan
1 / 5 shared
Slavík, Radan
1 / 5 shared
Špirková, Jarmila
1 / 1 shared
Míka, Martin
1 / 1 shared
Lahodný, František
1 / 1 shared
Ondráček, František
1 / 1 shared
Salavcová, Linda
1 / 1 shared
Chart of publication period
2015
2007

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Richter, Ivan
  • Kwiecien, Pavel
  • Chen, Lawrence R.
  • Wang, Junjia
  • Glesk, Ivan
  • Slavík, Radan
  • Špirková, Jarmila
  • Míka, Martin
  • Lahodný, František
  • Ondráček, František
  • Salavcová, Linda
OrganizationsLocationPeople

document

Simulations of waveguide Bragg grating filters based on subwavelength grating waveguide

  • Čtyroký, Jiří
  • Richter, Ivan
  • Kwiecien, Pavel
  • Chen, Lawrence R.
  • Wang, Junjia
  • Glesk, Ivan
Abstract

Recently, as a flexible and perspective alternative to standard silicon-on-insulator (SOI) nanophotonic platform, subwavelength grating structured (SWG) waveguides and more advanced nanophotonic structures based on this novel concept have attracted increasing attention within the community. Such structures relay on Bloch wave propagating concept, in contrast to standard index guiding mechanism. In this way, they can indeed provide a promising alternative to standard nanophotonic platform, due to a variety of signal processing functions provided with tunability of SWG structure parameters. This additional variability in the (effective) refractive index functionalities, applied in designs of novel integrated-optical nanophotonic components and devices, provides welcomed flexibility of present and potential for new concepts and components, without significantly increasing fabrication complexity. A SWG structure is based on a (quasi)-periodic arrangement between two different materials, i.e. rectangular blocks of silicon of different dimensions embedded into a lower-index superstrate, with a period much smaller than the wavelength of the light. Clearly, by changing the filling factor, i.e., the duty-cycle of the SWG structure, its effective refractive index can be varied essentially between that of the superstrate and that of substrate (silicon). Applying this idea, several types of SWG based structures and devices have been proposed in last couple of years, such as straight guides, crossings, mode transformers and convertors, polarization converters, ring resonators, MMI couplers, and specially designed tapered couplers for efficient light in/out coupling into SWG structures. However, it was not until recently when several of us have realized and theoretically demonstrated, with the help of properly tuned quasiperiodic modulation in grating structuring, that the SWG concept can also be used for designing SWG filtering devices such as Bragg optical filters.<br/>This contribution is thus devoted to a detailed numerical analysis of various novel designs of nanophotonic structures based on SWG with additional quasiperiodic modulation. For the numerical analysis, we effectively used and combined two approaches, either 3D Fourier modal methods, based on our two recently developed in-house and independent algorithms, aperiodic rigorous coupled wave analysis (aRCWA) and bidirectional expansion and propagation method based on Fourier series (BEX) with the Lumerical’s 2.5D FDTD commercially available propagation method. This comparison have not only enabled to ensure the reliability of the results, but also determined the advantages as well as limitations of the individual approaches. Based on that, we propose, simulate, and possibly optimize, the behavior of several filters and other structures based on SWG and quasiperiodicity modulation concept, with the discussion of their potential applicability.<br/>

Topics
  • impedance spectroscopy
  • simulation
  • Silicon